On 06/08/12 14:51, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
We still have MD5 as our default password hash, even though known-hash
attacks against MD5 are relatively easy these days. We've supported
SHA256 and SHA512 for many years now, so how about making SHA512 the
default instead of MD5, like on most
On 06/09/12 06:45, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 6/9/2012 3:34, Steve Franks wrote:
Every time libjpeg or
perl or python bumps the rev, I have to explain to my boss that I
won't be using my computer for 48 hours.
Lucky man! We are off from some desktop services (like LibreOffice and
Firefox) for more
On 2012-06-09 09:43, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 06/08/12 14:51, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
We still have MD5 as our default password hash, even though known-hash
attacks against MD5 are relatively easy these days. We've supported
SHA256 and SHA512 for many years now, so how about making SHA512 the
On 06/09/12 11:28, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-06-09 09:43, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 06/08/12 14:51, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
We still have MD5 as our default password hash, even though known-hash
attacks against MD5 are relatively easy these days. We've supported
SHA256 and SHA512 for many
My FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 boxes fail to build Thunderbird 13 compiling
with CLANG. The error is very much the same as when I try compiling
Firefox 13 on the same box with CLANG.
I tried to track down the problem, but I failed. Bot systems are used to
have very similar setups and ports, both
On 2012-06-09 14:14, O. Hartmann wrote:
My FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 boxes fail to build Thunderbird 13 compiling
with CLANG. The error is very much the same as when I try compiling
Firefox 13 on the same box with CLANG.
...
I'm not sure this problem is related to clang at all, see below.
I
On 06/09/12 14:53, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-06-09 14:14, O. Hartmann wrote:
My FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 boxes fail to build Thunderbird 13 compiling
with CLANG. The error is very much the same as when I try compiling
Firefox 13 on the same box with CLANG.
...
I'm not sure this problem
On 6/9/2012 14:50, O. Hartmann wrote:
Lucky man! We are off from some desktop services (like LibreOffice and
Firefox) for more than a week now!
Why did you update to begin with? Bug/security fix?
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
___
On 06/09/12 15:43, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 6/9/2012 14:50, O. Hartmann wrote:
Lucky man! We are off from some desktop services (like LibreOffice and
Firefox) for more than a week now!
Why did you update to begin with? Bug/security fix?
--
Adam Strohl
http://www.ateamsystems.com/
Well,
I just have successfully (*) build LibreOffice by just typing
# make build in editors/libreoffice...
* Without any manually removed hiccups. Dependencies
build with clang fine too, as graphics/vigra is updated.
--
View this message in context:
I try to track down problems on one of our FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64
boxes and therefore, I try recompiling xorg.
One box is constantly failing to compile port graphics/dri with a
obviously well know error, as googling reveals (
I have recently tried the PORTS_MODULES knob, and found a problem. The
ports tree searches for some dependencies by finding a binary in PATH,
and that fails since by default /usr/local/ isn't there. The attached
patch fixes that problem.
It would be more robust to use PREFIX there instead of
On 06/09/12 18:03, Jakub Lach wrote:
I just have successfully (*) build LibreOffice by just typing
# make build in editors/libreoffice...
* Without any manually removed hiccups. Dependencies
build with clang fine too, as graphics/vigra is updated.
--
Did you made the built in a
On 9 June 2012 18:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have recently tried the PORTS_MODULES knob, and found a problem. The
ports tree searches for some dependencies by finding a binary in PATH,
and that fails since by default /usr/local/ isn't there. The attached
patch fixes that
On 2012-06-09 19:00, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
I try to track down problems on one of our FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64
boxes and therefore, I try recompiling xorg.
One box is constantly failing to compile port graphics/dri with a
obviously well know error, as googling reveals (
On 09/06/2012 18:26, Chris Rees wrote:
On 9 June 2012 18:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have recently tried the PORTS_MODULES knob, and found a problem. The
ports tree searches for some dependencies by finding a binary in PATH,
and that fails since by default /usr/local/ isn't
The same one I had problems earlier. I heard
that you shouldn't have boost* ports installed
prior, but when I had problems I didn't.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Re-Why-Are-You-NOT-Using-FreeBSD-tp5714183p5716943.html
Sent from the freebsd-current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 06/09/2012 10:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 09/06/2012 18:26, Chris Rees wrote:
On 9 June 2012 18:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have recently tried the PORTS_MODULES knob, and found a
problem. The ports tree searches for some
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 06/09/2012 10:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 09/06/2012 18:26, Chris Rees wrote:
On 9 June 2012 18:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have recently tried the
On 06/09/12 19:34, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-06-09 19:00, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
I try to track down problems on one of our FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64
boxes and therefore, I try recompiling xorg.
One box is constantly failing to compile port graphics/dri with a
obviously well know
TB --- 2012-06-09 19:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-09 19:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On 2012-06-09 21:57, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
Now, with your patch set installed again, graphics/dri compiles without
a flaw.
I was wondering why there are not more people/FreeBSD users out there
having the very same problem.
Most likely because neither WITH_NEW_XORG nor CC=clang are defaults
Ok, after reading your PR and discussion on IRC I have the following
which incorporates all the suggestions so far. I haven't actually tested
this yet, but if people agree that this is the right direction to go I
will before I commit it of course.
Doug
--
It's always a long day;
TB --- 2012-06-09 19:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-09 19:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-06-09 19:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-09 19:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-06-09 19:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-09 19:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
Ok, never mind the last one ... this patch I've actually tested. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Index: kern.post.mk
===
--- kern.post.mk(revision 236818)
+++ kern.post.mk(working
On Jun 9, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
Ok, never mind the last one ... this patch I've actually tested. :)
This one looks good :) (and fixes the item I briefly mentioned in IRC);
I'll test it one out.
Thanks!
-Garrett___
On Jun 5, 2012, at 7:10 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:27:51 am Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, May 31, 2012 a las 11:34:55AM -0400, John Baldwin escribió:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
if_vxn.c: In function 'vxn_load_multicast':
if_vxn.c:719: warning:
I build out of my UFS-only VM in VMware Fusion from time to time, and
it looks like there's a large chunk of processes that are swapped out when
doing two parallel builds:
last pid: 27644; load averages: 2.43, 0.94, 0.98
30 matches
Mail list logo