On Sep 21, 2012, at 9:15 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:14:36PM -0400, Darrel wrote:
Welcome to the wonderful world that no one knows how UPDATING works
anymore...
-Garrett
Thank you.
Assholes [ pardon me] that they tend to be, with many
Am 09/21/12 23:39, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
Hi all,
As a followup to my previous post about the performance of FreeBSD 10.0
kernels compiled with different compilers (clang and gcc), I did another
series of tests, now on a more modern machine (Core i5-based). I also
tested the performance
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Hi all,
As a followup to my previous post about the performance of FreeBSD 10.0
kernels compiled with different compilers (clang and gcc), I did another
series of tests, now on a more modern machine (Core i5-based). I also
On 2012-09-22 09:35, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 09/21/12 23:39, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
...
At least one can say FreeBSD does not suffer from performance drain
using the cutting edge clang 3.2 compared with a gcc 4.2.1 compiler, the
echo from the past.
Well, the main idea of these tests is to
Hello Dimitry.
Am 09/22/12 13:43, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
On 2012-09-22 09:35, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 09/21/12 23:39, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
...
At least one can say FreeBSD does not suffer from performance drain
using the cutting edge clang 3.2 compared with a gcc 4.2.1 compiler, the
echo
snip
Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a
OpenBSD Packet Firewall that survives upgrades. Perhaps I should just
take all of the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use
ipfw2.
Darrel
On the subject of OpenBSD Packet Firewall
OpenBSD 4.5
On 2012-09-22 14:52, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
When we used FreeBSD for scientific work, that was around 1998 - 2002,
there were some attempts made to use Intel's icc compiler suite on
FreeBSD in the 32Bit Linuxulator. That time I used that compiler only
for compiling my modelling software, but
Am 09/22/12 15:52, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
On 2012-09-22 14:52, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
When we used FreeBSD for scientific work, that was around 1998 - 2002,
there were some attempts made to use Intel's icc compiler suite on
FreeBSD in the 32Bit Linuxulator. That time I used that compiler
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:20:14PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Hi all,
As a followup to my previous post about the performance of FreeBSD 10.0
kernels compiled with different compilers (clang and gcc), I did another
serial terminal not available, backtrace is a screen pic:
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/b4TkAWaGPH7GkNH1VxuMJtv5Be3qwMGuK3qX4J5X-tk?feat=directlink
--
thanks
-kim
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:13:58PM -0400, Kim Culhan wrote:
K serial terminal not available, backtrace is a screen pic:
K
K
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:13:58PM -0400, Kim Culhan wrote:
K serial terminal not available, backtrace is a screen pic:
K
K
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/b4TkAWaGPH7GkNH1VxuMJtv5Be3qwMGuK3qX4J5X-tk?feat=directlink
Why didn't you make dump?
db call doadump
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
snip
Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a OpenBSD
Packet Firewall that survives upgrades. Perhaps I should just take all of
the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use ipfw2.
Darrel
On the subject of OpenBSD Packet Firewall
OpenBSD 4.5
snip
Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a OpenBSD
Packet Firewall that survives upgrades. Perhaps I should just take all of
the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use ipfw2.
Darrel
On the subject of OpenBSD Packet Firewall
OpenBSD 4.5
14 matches
Mail list logo
