Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1

2012-10-14 Thread Jakub Lach
Thanks for replies. * Finally, default values for many things on 64-bit machines have been adjusted upward significantly to make proper use of available resources Well that one should be fast to test, if it really makes so much difference. * Scheduler rewrite They threw out old scheduler

Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1

2012-10-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 14/10/2012 00:27 Pedro Giffuni said the following: Actually ... On 10/13/2012 13:38, Jakub Lach wrote: I'm not at all up to date with DragonFly, so does anybody know what did they change so spectacularly between 3.0/3.2? Their explanation of the changes is here:

Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1

2012-10-14 Thread Alexander Motin
On 14.10.2012 12:47, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/10/2012 00:27 Pedro Giffuni said the following: Actually ... On 10/13/2012 13:38, Jakub Lach wrote: I'm not at all up to date with DragonFly, so does anybody know what did they change so spectacularly between 3.0/3.2? Their explanation of the

Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1

2012-10-14 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:09:47AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote: * Scheduler rewrite They threw out old scheduler and have instant gains? That's too good to be true, seeing as still some loathe ULE in FreeBSD after all this time. 'loathe' appears to be an interesting choice of word. I do

Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1

2012-10-14 Thread Jakub Lach
I do not loathe ULE, but I also do not use ULE. Maybe my wording wasn't exactly suitable, but that was the point I was trying to make. ULE is default for quite some time (and boasted impressive benchmarks upon introduction too), yet in reality 4BSD is far from being superseded for many. --

Re: Message in_cksum_skip: out of data by ....

2012-10-14 Thread Michael Butler
On 10/08/12 04:04, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: David and Michael, On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: G On 10/07/12 13:03, Garrett Cooper wrote: G Maybe these revisions had something to do with it... (r241245 is G more likely)? G G I reverted r241245 and the

git.freebsd.org is down?

2012-10-14 Thread Oliver Pinter
Hi All! I got this message, when I why try to pull from git.freebsd.org: ---8--- fatal: unable to connect git.freebsd.org: git.freebsd.org[0: 69.147.83.33]: errno=Connection refused git.freebsd.org[1: 2001:4f8:fff6::21]: errno=No route to host ---8--- The IPv6 related are ok, while this machine

Re: pkg (aka pkgng) 1.0 released

2012-10-14 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/30/2012 10:56 AM, John Nielsen wrote: Running ps in another terminal shows pkg query %n-%v. Since the actual pkg is now gone, I suspect this is really /usr/sbin/pkg. I further suspect that it's waiting for y/n input (whether to install the binary pkg) on its nonexistent stdin

Re: git.freebsd.org is down?

2012-10-14 Thread Adrian Chadd
The cluster is being relocated! adrian On 14 October 2012 12:50, Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All! I got this message, when I why try to pull from git.freebsd.org: ---8--- fatal: unable to connect git.freebsd.org: git.freebsd.org[0: 69.147.83.33]: errno=Connection