fwiw, im about to start hacking away at bsd.ports.mk and alike for this
exact reason (i'm trying to avoid doing so). am i free/welcome/open to
register this on Google SOC? will anybody here mentor?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Vale
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:21 AM
To: Ch
TB --- 2012-10-25 00:33:48 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-25 00:33:48 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
P.s. - for what it's worth - Google are interested in porting bionic back
to *BSD, i've seen some discussion on the NetBSD lists.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Vale
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:01 AM
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012?
yeah, 32-bit vs. 64, or mips, arm, etc etc.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Burns
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:04 AM
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Fw: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!
On 10/24/2012 4:57 PM, Michael Vale wrote:
-Original M
On 10/24/2012 4:57 PM, Michael Vale wrote:
-Original Message- From: Michael Vale Sent: Thursday, October
25, 2012 8:57 AM To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In
2012? You can help too!
oh i only replied to you, not the thread.
I have some ideas though...
-Original
Another idea, how about reducing the size of libc, porting bionic back to
freebsd and/or porting musl libc (http://www.musl-libc.org) to FreeBSD?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:29 AM
To: Michael Vale
Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 201
-Original Message-
From: Michael Vale
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:57 AM
To: Adrian Chadd
Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!
oh i only replied to you, not the thread.
I have some ideas though...
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd
Se
http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/2221
Is this will help somehow? :)
2012/9/14 Alexander Yerenkow
> Well, I have 3 sd cards, and only one of them could boot prev kernel;
> Currently, new mine built kernel can't mount working card too, only
> difference that I got error 6 (IIRC) instead of 19.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 00:19 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> > http://www.strugglingcoder.info/patches/hwpmc_nits_1.txt
> >
> > Fixing a few typos with this patch.
> >
> > Please let me know if this looks okay.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hiren
>
> Sen
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:59:07PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 23 October 2012 12:54, David Magda wrote:
>> > On Tue, October 23, 2012 10:39, Fbsd8 wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The subject is Google Code-In and all the posted tasks are directed at
>
On 24 October 2012 13:24, Fernando Apesteguía
wrote:
> Also related to that, what about writing a section about redports[1]
> in the porter's handbook[2]?
This is a good documentation task... but we need more *coding* tasks as well.
> And as a side question, shouldn't some (or all) of these task
on 20/10/2012 20:39 Garrett Cooper said the following:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
>> main.o: In function `usage':
>> main.c:(.text+0x17): undefined reference to `arg_printusage'
>> main.o: In function `main':
>> main.c:(.text+0x77): undefined reference to `getarg
TB --- 2012-10-24 14:32:18 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-24 14:32:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On 10/23/2012 08:14, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
Hi,
I'm just syncing my ARM pmap code (base on i386 one) with current
i386 pmap code. It looks that sched_pin() is missing after successful
rw_try_wlock() in pmap_protect().
Yes
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 00:19 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> http://www.strugglingcoder.info/patches/hwpmc_nits_1.txt
>
> Fixing a few typos with this patch.
>
> Please let me know if this looks okay.
>
> Thanks,
> Hiren
Sendinglib/libpmc/libpmc.c
Sendinglib/libpmc/pmc.ivybridg
On 24.10.2012 16:26, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
Hi,
We have 'maxusers' tunable which affects many other tunables, e.g. number of
network mbuf/clusters which is often too low on current machines.
The mbuf/cluster limit can be rethought as well. Since it all comes
out of UMA and is not pre-allocate
Hi,
We have 'maxusers' tunable which affects many other tunables, e.g. number of
network mbuf/clusters which is often too low on current machines.
There is code in sys/kern/subr_param.c:
if (maxusers == 0) {
maxusers = physpages / (2 * 1024 * 1024 / PAGE_SIZE);
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:59:07PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 23 October 2012 12:54, David Magda wrote:
> > On Tue, October 23, 2012 10:39, Fbsd8 wrote:
> >>
> >> The subject is Google Code-In and all the posted tasks are directed at
> >> creating documentation. Not one deals with coding any p
18 matches
Mail list logo
