Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2012-12-20 Thread Fabian Keil
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: Experiments with dummynet shown ineffective support for very short tick-based callouts. New version fixes that, allowing to get as many tick-based callout events as hz value permits, while still be able to aggregate events and generating minimum of

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2012-12-20 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski luk...@wasikowski.net wrote: W dniu 2012-12-19 07:14, Kimmo Paasiala pisze: I wrote a small patch for /etc/network.subr to add support for ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in

Re: clang compiled kernel panic when mounting zfs root on i386

2012-12-20 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
18.12.2012 00:20, Andriy Gapon: It's been already mentioned many times that ZFS works much better on amd64. It's up to a (potential) user to understand limitations of i386 and to decide whether to use ZFS, in what situations and how. You may want to consider using KSTACK_PAGES=4 in your kernel

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2012-12-20 Thread Alexander Motin
On 20.12.2012 12:56, Fabian Keil wrote: Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: Experiments with dummynet shown ineffective support for very short tick-based callouts. New version fixes that, allowing to get as many tick-based callout events as hz value permits, while still be able to

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2012-12-20 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: A question related to this for those who have been doing work on the rc(8) scripts. Can I assume that /usr/bin is available when network.subr functions are used? Doing calculations on hexadecimal numbers is going to be very

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2012-12-20 Thread Fabian Keil
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: On 20.12.2012 12:56, Fabian Keil wrote: Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: Experiments with dummynet shown ineffective support for very short tick-based callouts. New version fixes that, allowing to get as many tick-based callout events as

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2012-12-20 Thread Alexander Motin
On 20.12.2012 15:26, Fabian Keil wrote: Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: On 20.12.2012 12:56, Fabian Keil wrote: Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: Experiments with dummynet shown ineffective support for very short tick-based callouts. New version fixes that, allowing to get as

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2012-12-20 Thread Fabian Keil
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: On 20.12.2012 15:26, Fabian Keil wrote: Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: On 20.12.2012 12:56, Fabian Keil wrote: Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: Experiments with dummynet shown ineffective support for very short tick-based

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD git mirrors demoted to beta status, need your help

2012-12-20 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Ulrich, Are you still hoping for feedback on this? If so I am currently setting up to run your scripts from: http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow#History Let me know if that is not needed though because if I don't need to then I can save myself a bunch of work. I'll report back to you on my

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2012-12-20 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Jilles Tjoelker jil...@stack.nl wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: A question related to this for those who have been doing work on the rc(8) scripts. Can I assume that /usr/bin is available when network.subr functions are