Re: Better pkg bootstrapping instructions?

2013-02-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:46:41PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: Especially on -CURRENT, it's not going to be uncommon to see things like this: The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: y Bootstrapping pkg please wait

Re: scheduler-swapper, SI_SUB_RUN_SCHEDULER-SI_SUB_LAST

2013-02-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 02/02/2013 16:50 Konstantin Belousov said the following: On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 01:50:40PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: I would like to propose the following mostly cosmetic change: http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/scheduler-swapper.diff This is something that bit me early in my FreeBSD

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:30:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: Andriy Gapon wrote: on 31/01/2013 15:29 Sergey Kandaurov said the following: Hi. Got this assertion on idle NFS server while `ls -la /.zfs/shares/' issued on NFS client. kern/vfs_vnops.c:_vn_lock()

Re: r246057: buildworld fails with: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so: undefined reference to `std::bad_alloc::~bad_alloc()'

2013-02-03 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 01/31/13 10:10, schrieb David Chisnall: On 31 Jan 2013, at 04:37, O. Hartmann wrote: First, I suspected the c++ option -std=c++11 I issued in /etc/src.conf when building the sources - I did this before without any problems. Then, leaving the build without -std=c++11 option, I get the

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hi, I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio work. Now I am asking for the last round of testing and review, esp. for the !x86 architectures. Another testing focus are the SCSI HBAs and RAID

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hi, I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio work. Now I am asking for the last round of testing and review, esp. for the !x86

DEBUG_FLAGS broken with -jX (Was: svn commit: r244236 - head/share/mk)

2013-02-03 Thread Jan Beich
Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org writes: Author: emaste Date: Sat Dec 15 00:03:35 2012 New Revision: 244236 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/244236 Log: Put shared library debug info into separate .symbols file Sponsored by: ADARA Networks Does this work with -jX ? $

CURRENT: Broken on r246222?

2013-02-03 Thread O. Hartmann
CURRENT, as of recent Revision 246285 (see below) fails and crashes/reboots on an Ivy-Bridge platform (see below). Since the box does not have debugging switched on (not yet, will do eventually Monday), Last thing I see on screen is p4tcc3: CPU Frequency Thermal Control on cpu3 then the system

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Rick Macklem
Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:30:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: Andriy Gapon wrote: on 31/01/2013 15:29 Sergey Kandaurov said the following: Hi. Got this assertion on idle NFS server while `ls -la /.zfs/shares/' issued on NFS client.

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:11:45PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hi, I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio work. Now I

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 03/02/2013 18:36 Rick Macklem said the following: I can think of two possibilities: 1 - ZFS isn't setting VV_ROOT on the root vnode under some condition. or 2 - The vnode was left locked from some previous operation that happened to be done by this thread. Doesn't seem likely, but???

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 05:46:24PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:11:45PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hi, I finished the

detect mwait capabilities and extensions

2013-02-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
Guys, could you please the following change? It is amd64-centric now, but obviously I plan equivalent changes for i386. I am mostly concerned about proper header files for various definitions and proper names for them. Especially I am not sure where to put STATE_RUNNING, STATE_MWAIT,

gpart resize vs. cache?

2013-02-03 Thread Tim Kientzle
I'm tinkering with a disk image that automatically fills whatever media you put it onto. But I'm having trouble with gpart resize failing. Disk layout: MBR with two slices mmcsd0s1 and mmcsd0s2 bsdlabel with one partition mmcsd0s2a Before I can use growfs, I have two gpart resize

Re: r246057: buildworld fails with: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so: undefined reference to `std::bad_alloc::~bad_alloc()'

2013-02-03 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-01-29 11:06, O. Hartmann wrote: I receive this error since yesterday building world and it is still sticky on most recent sources (r246057) and I was wondering why the tinderboxes do not pick this up on the 10.0-CURRENT builds ... just for a notice for the development folks ... ...

Re: gpart resize vs. cache?

2013-02-03 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 12:06 -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: I'm tinkering with a disk image that automatically fills whatever media you put it onto. But I'm having trouble with gpart resize failing. Disk layout: MBR with two slices mmcsd0s1 and mmcsd0s2 bsdlabel with one partition

Re: gpart resize vs. cache?

2013-02-03 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 12:06:41 -0800 Tim Kientzle kient...@freebsd.org wrote: I'm tinkering with a disk image that automatically fills whatever media you put it onto. But I'm having trouble with gpart resize failing. Disk layout: MBR with two slices mmcsd0s1 and mmcsd0s2

Re: gpart resize vs. cache?

2013-02-03 Thread Tim Kientzle
On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:08 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 12:06 -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: I'm tinkering with a disk image that automatically fills whatever media you put it onto. But I'm having trouble with gpart resize failing. Disk layout: MBR with two slices mmcsd0s1

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Rick Macklem
Andriy Gapon wrote: on 03/02/2013 18:36 Rick Macklem said the following: I can think of two possibilities: 1 - ZFS isn't setting VV_ROOT on the root vnode under some condition. or 2 - The vnode was left locked from some previous operation that happened to be done by this thread.

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Rick Macklem
Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:30:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: Andriy Gapon wrote: on 31/01/2013 15:29 Sergey Kandaurov said the following: Hi. Got this assertion on idle NFS server while `ls -la /.zfs/shares/' issued on NFS client.

Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

2013-02-03 Thread Rick Macklem
Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:30:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: Andriy Gapon wrote: on 31/01/2013 15:29 Sergey Kandaurov said the following: Hi. Got this assertion on idle NFS server while `ls -la /.zfs/shares/' issued on NFS client. Ok, here's a

Re: gpart resize vs. cache?

2013-02-03 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Tim Kientzle wrote: On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:08 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 12:06 -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: I'm tinkering with a disk image that automatically fills whatever media you put it onto. But I'm having trouble with gpart resize failing. Disk