Hello, Don.
You wrote 1 марта 2013 г., 9:11:32:
DL> The fact that the filesystem code called panic() indicates that the
DL> filesystem was already corrupt by that point. That's a likely reason
DL> for fsck complaining about the unexpected SU+J inconsistency.
DL> Incorrect write ordering that all
On 28 Feb, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Lev.
> You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 14:13:23:
>
> LS>>> My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS.
> LS>>> It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck
> LS>>> says "Unexpected SU+J inconsistency" (Inode mode/directory
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:15:46 am matt wrote:
> On 02/27/13 12:27, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:35:43 pm matt wrote:
> >> On 02/27/13 09:00, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> If that is true, it's because your BIOS is lying. Do you have a URL to
> >>> your ASL lying aro
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
[..]
>
> From cleveland ohio and www.freebsd.org is un-reachable again. It comes and
> gos. To me it's acting like someone high up is making dns changes.
> Some freebsd official better contact yahoo and put a stop to what ever there
> fooling around wi
Hello, Ivan.
You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 18:56:47:
LS> There was commit r246876, but I don't understand exactly what it
LS> means, as no real FS or driver's code was touched.
And, yes, barriers are much stronger than "sync writes", as they
should flush all previous writes, even that is
Hello, Ivan.
You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 18:19:38:
>>Maybe, it is subtile interference between raid5 implementation and
>> SU+J, but in such case I want to understand what does raid5 do
>> wrong.
IV> You guessed correctly, I was going to blame geom_raid5 :)
It is not first time :( Bu
On 28/02/2013 11:31, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> WD disks are in software RAID5 with geom_raid5 (from ports, but I'm
> active maintainer of it).
>Disks are in "Default" configuration: WC and NCQ are enabled.
>
>I know, that FS guys could blame geom_raid5, as it could delay real
> write up
TB --- 2013-02-28 13:09:36 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-02-28 13:09:37 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 14:13:23:
LS>>> My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS.
LS>>> It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck
LS>>> says "Unexpected SU+J inconsistency" (Inode mode/directory tyme
LS>>> mismatch) and requested full check
Peter Wemm wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2013-02-27 20:25, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
I have installed snapshot
FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE-amd64-20130223-r247167-release.iso
# traceroute ftp.freebsd.org
3
Hello, Alexander.
You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 14:22:59:
AY> Could you afford reproducing this? :)
After half a day of memtest86+ :)
I want to be sure, that it is not memory problem first.
AY> Also, would be nice to know how look your setup (CPUs, how much disks, how
AY> they connected, is i
2013/2/28 Lev Serebryakov
> Hello, Lev.
> You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 12:33:25:
>
> LS>> My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS.
> LS>> It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck
> LS>> says "Unexpected SU+J inconsistency" (Inode mode/directory tyme
> LS>
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 12:33:25:
LS>> My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS.
LS>> It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck
LS>> says "Unexpected SU+J inconsistency" (Inode mode/directory tyme
LS>> mismatch) and requested full check (whi
Hello, Alexander.
You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 13:07:35:
AY> How about tell us 9.1-STABLE from which date you run?
r244957
AY> Do you use any dumps/snapshots in this FS?
Nope.
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.o
How about tell us 9.1-STABLE from which date you run?
Do you use any dumps/snapshots in this FS?
In past, that could broke things.
--
Regards,
Alexander Yerenkow
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 12:06:30:
LS> Hello, Freebsd-fs.
LS> My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS.
LS> It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck
LS> says "Unexpected SU+J inconsistency" (Inode mode/directory tyme
LS> mismatch) and reque
Hello, Freebsd-fs.
My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS.
It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck
says "Unexpected SU+J inconsistency" (Inode mode/directory tyme
mismatch) and requested full check (which will take more than hour on
such FS).
All drives
17 matches
Mail list logo
