Re: ale(4) cannot negotiate as GigE

2013-03-05 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:43:15PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: Could you disable WOL before rebooting your box? # ifconfig ale0 -wol # reboot It came up as 100baseTX. :( You don't use any manual link configuration, right? Right, everything is auto (that is, the defaults).

Re: access to hard drives is blocked by writes to a flash drive

2013-03-05 Thread Don Lewis
On 5 Mar, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In message 201303050519.r255jbau012...@gw.catspoiler.org, Don Lewis writes: That's been my opinion for a long time as well, though I think it would be better to have one thread per device to avoid syncer

Re: access to hard drives is blocked by writes to a flash drive

2013-03-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 201303050840.r258egag012...@gw.catspoiler.org, Don Lewis writes: For composite devices such as mirrors, using the first underlying device is probably a reasonable choice. For more complicated cases, or to override the default, the syncer thread could be specified as a mount option. I

Re: serial console not accepting input?

2013-03-05 Thread Eggert, Lars
On Mar 4, 2013, at 20:59, Doug Ambrisko ambri...@ambrisko.com wrote: Try to do a {Ctrl}D to see if works. We've seen that the TX on reset hangs but input works fine. I'm not sure if we ran into this with uart(4) but had a problem with sio(4). No change. Lars

Re: ale(4) cannot negotiate as GigE

2013-03-05 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:06:20AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:43:15PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: Could you disable WOL before rebooting your box? # ifconfig ale0 -wol # reboot It came up as 100baseTX. :( You don't use any manual link

Re: ale(4) cannot negotiate as GigE

2013-03-05 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:57:03PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: Hmm, Does the switch support EEE feature? If yes, would you try disabling it? I do not think it [1] does; plus I cannot do much about this switch, as I'm pretty far away from it right now. ./danfe [1]

r247829: dbus fails to start. portmaster SIGNAL 13 when doing extraction

2013-03-05 Thread Hartmann, O.
On FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #3 r247829: Tue Mar 5 08:12:19 CET 2013/amd64 I run into a mess and can not figure out what happens. Suddenly, after upgrading, buildworld etc., dbus fails to start so X11 is without mouse. Trying to rebuild the port dbus fails in a SIGNAL 13 while [do-extract]. This is

Re: access to hard drives is blocked by writes to a flash drive

2013-03-05 Thread Don Lewis
On 5 Mar, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message 201303050840.r258egag012...@gw.catspoiler.org, Don Lewis writes: For composite devices such as mirrors, using the first underlying device is probably a reasonable choice. For more complicated cases, or to override the default, the syncer thread

Re: r247829: dbus fails to start. portmaster SIGNAL 13 when doing extraction

2013-03-05 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-03-05 10:16, Hartmann, O. wrote: On FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #3 r247829: Tue Mar 5 08:12:19 CET 2013/amd64 I run into a mess and can not figure out what happens. Suddenly, after upgrading, buildworld etc., dbus fails to start so X11 is without mouse. Trying to rebuild the port dbus fails

Re: r247829: dbus fails to start. portmaster SIGNAL 13 when doing extraction

2013-03-05 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 03/05/13 10:33, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2013-03-05 10:16, Hartmann, O. wrote: On FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #3 r247829: Tue Mar 5 08:12:19 CET 2013/amd64 I run into a mess and can not figure out what happens. Suddenly, after upgrading, buildworld etc., dbus fails to start so X11 is without

Re: r247829: dbus fails to start. portmaster SIGNAL 13 when doing extraction

2013-03-05 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 03/05/13 10:33, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2013-03-05 10:16, Hartmann, O. wrote: On FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #3 r247829: Tue Mar 5 08:12:19 CET 2013/amd64 I run into a mess and can not figure out what happens. Suddenly, after upgrading, buildworld etc., dbus fails to start so X11 is without

r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Hartmann, O.
On r247835 build kernel fails: cc -O2 -pipe -O3 -pipe -march=native -O3 -march=native -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GATE/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -fno-common -fno-omit-frame-pointer

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
On 05.03.2013 11:20, Hartmann, O. wrote: On r247835 build kernel fails: (...) /usr/src/sys/modules/drm2/drm2/../../../dev/drm2/drm_global.c:63:27: error: unused variable 'item' [-Werror,-Wunused-variable] struct drm_global_item *item = glob[i]; Could you try the patch

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 03/05/13 11:46, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: On 05.03.2013 11:20, Hartmann, O. wrote: On r247835 build kernel fails: (...) /usr/src/sys/modules/drm2/drm2/../../../dev/drm2/drm_global.c:63:27: error: unused variable 'item' [-Werror,-Wunused-variable] struct drm_global_item

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Glen Barber
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:59:50PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote: Could you try the patch below? http://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/radeonkms/drm_global-unused-variable.a.patch Got new sources, I'm at FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r247839: Tue Mar 5 12:28:12 CET 2013/amd64 and the kernel

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
On 05.03.2013 13:30, Glen Barber wrote: dev/drm2/ttm/ttm_lock.h:208: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'ttm_write_unlock' [-Wredundant-decls] dev/drm2/ttm/ttm_lock.h:134: warning: previous declaration of 'ttm_write_unlock' was here dev/drm2/ttm/ttm_lock.h:220: warning: redundant

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread J.R. Oldroyd
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:13:12 +0100 Jean-Sébastien Pédron dumbb...@freebsd.org wrote: On 05.03.2013 13:30, Glen Barber wrote: dev/drm2/ttm/ttm_lock.h:208: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'ttm_write_unlock' [-Wredundant-decls] dev/drm2/ttm/ttm_lock.h:134: warning: previous declaration

drm GPU hung, resume no longer working

2013-03-05 Thread Glen Barber
Hi, I am running: FreeBSD nucleus 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #87 r247546: Fri Mar 1 13:15:42 EST 2013 root@nucleus:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NUCLEUS amd64 Sometime very recently, resume has stopped working. I can ssh to the machine when it resumes, and I do see my background image

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
On 05.03.2013 15:54, J.R. Oldroyd wrote: A fix for these is in my big get it to compile patch that I emailed you both the other day. Sorry, I didn't take the time to read it yet :-/ dev/drm2/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c:122: warning: declaration does not declare anything

Re: drm GPU hung, resume no longer working

2013-03-05 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
On 05.03.2013 16:07, Glen Barber wrote: error: [drm:pid12:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung info: [drm] capturing error event; look for more information in sysctl hw.dri.0.info.i915_error_state hw.dri.0.info.i915_error_state output is at:

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:13:12PM +0100, Jean-S?bastien P?dron wrote: On 05.03.2013 13:30, Glen Barber wrote: dev/drm2/ttm/ttm_lock.h:208: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'ttm_write_unlock' [-Wredundant-decls] dev/drm2/ttm/ttm_lock.h:134: warning: previous declaration of

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Glen Barber
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Glen neglected to even mention that he used gcc (is it true ?), as well as to show the command line invocation of the compiler. Hopefully the patch helps. Yes, I am using gcc. I'll try your patch and report back. Glen

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Glen Barber
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:48:31AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Glen neglected to even mention that he used gcc (is it true ?), as well as to show the command line invocation of the compiler. Hopefully the patch helps.

Re: access to hard drives is blocked by writes to a flash drive

2013-03-05 Thread Ian Lepore
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 21:27 -0800, Don Lewis wrote: On 4 Mar, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 19:01 -0800, Don Lewis wrote: On 3 Mar, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: For various reasons (see: Lemming-syncer) FreeBSD will block all I/O traffic to other disks too, when these pileups

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:54:29AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:48:31AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Glen neglected to even mention that he used gcc (is it true ?), as well as to show the command

Re: access to hard drives is blocked by writes to a flash drive

2013-03-05 Thread Ian Lepore
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 21:33 -0800, Don Lewis wrote: On 4 Mar, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 20:28 +, Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message - From: Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org To: Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: deeptech71 deeptec...@gmail.com;

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
On 05.03.2013 16:37, Konstantin Belousov wrote: The patch below is supposed to fix double declaration (it is pathetic that clang silently accepts this, while issuing countless useless warnings). Also there is a usual workaround for the anonimous union/struct issue. What do you think about

Re: r247835: drm2 code breaks buildkernel

2013-03-05 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:40:34PM +0100, Jean-S?bastien P?dron wrote: On 05.03.2013 16:37, Konstantin Belousov wrote: The patch below is supposed to fix double declaration (it is pathetic that clang silently accepts this, while issuing countless useless warnings). Also there is a usual

r247839: broken pipe - for top, sudo and ports

2013-03-05 Thread Hartmann, O.
On recent FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 (CLANG buildworld, serveral systems (3) the same symptoms)), many services drop a sporadic broken pipe This happesn to system's top (I have to type it several times to get finally a top), it happens to sudo su -, it happens to SSH (drops connection with

Re: r247839: broken pipe - for top, sudo and ports

2013-03-05 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 03/05/13 20:35, Hartmann, O. wrote: On recent FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 (CLANG buildworld, serveral systems (3) the same symptoms)), many services drop a sporadic broken pipe This happesn to system's top (I have to type it several times to get finally a top), it happens to sudo su -,

Re: Airport card is not recognized on i386

2013-03-05 Thread Adrian Chadd
You need to provide much more information than that. Like, starting with what kind of airport card it is, what the PCI ID is, etc. Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To

Kernel panic on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64

2013-03-05 Thread Adam Kirchhoff
I have recently installed 9.1 and attempted to upgrade to 10.0-CURRENT yesterday (largely in an effort to test the new radeon DRM code). Unfortunately, upon rebooting, I am left at kernel debugger prompt: cd0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 cd0: TSSTcorp CD-ROM TS-H192C DE00 Removable CD-ROM

Re: Kernel panic on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64

2013-03-05 Thread Ryan Stone
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Adam Kirchhoff adam.k.kirchh...@gmail.comwrote: I have recently installed 9.1 and attempted to upgrade to 10.0-CURRENT yesterday (largely in an effort to test the new radeon DRM code). Unfortunately, upon rebooting, I am left at kernel debugger prompt: cd0 at

Re: access to hard drives is blocked by writes to a flash drive

2013-03-05 Thread Don Lewis
On 5 Mar, Ian Lepore wrote: I've debated playing with the bio work loop in mmcsd to see if moving reads ahead of writes was helpful, but that seems like a dangerous path to go down without some mitigation strategy to ensure that writes go through eventually. That seems especially important

Re: access to hard drives is blocked by writes to a flash drive

2013-03-05 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 3/5/13 9:37 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 5 Mar, Ian Lepore wrote: I've debated playing with the bio work loop in mmcsd to see if moving reads ahead of writes was helpful, but that seems like a dangerous path to go down without some mitigation strategy to ensure that writes go through

Re: access to hard drives is blocked by writes to a flash drive

2013-03-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In message 1362500313.1291.20.ca...@revolution.hippie.lan, Ian Lepore writes: I don't think so, in our case. Have you seriously considered using msdosfs ? The cards flash-adaption-layer may work a LOT better if you do... -- Poul-Henning