> Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 May 2013, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> >
> > DB>I don't know about current, but on 9.1-stable, the nfsstat -m only
> > works
> > DB>for root! nfsstat can be run by anybody.
> >
> > Same for current. It silently prints nothing. Took me some time
> > to figure out I
On 04.05.2013 08:14, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Speaker/headphones working great on Current.
>
> Was trying to get the microphone working, but it seems to not quite
> be working.
>
> By "not" working, there is no audio detected when recording. Is
> there something in here that looks like a thing that I
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 22:03 -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> what is the output of running the command 'mixer'?
$ mixer
Mixer vol is currently set to 95:95
Mixer pcm is currently set to 100:100
Mixer speaker is currently set to 100:100
Mixer mic is currently set to 100:100
Mixer rec
On Fri, 03 May 2013 21:14:16 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>
>--=-0ChyxBdnPLit6KyXtgKU
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Speaker/headphones working great on Current.
>
>Was trying to get the microphone working, but it seems to not quite be
Speaker/headphones working great on Current.
Was trying to get the microphone working, but it seems to not quite be
working.
By "not" working, there is no audio detected when recording. Is there
something in here that looks like a thing that I should adjust?
http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/
Well the last I checked, clang was still busted on ppc32. YMMV.
I still don't think you're gonna get much use out of a ppc machine for any
form of effects unless you're just talking about using it as an equalizer.
For that matter, you could do almost all of it on the i386 laptop. Why do
you need t
There was trouble building qt4 on FreeBSD 10.0 with clang and llvm.
So, I can help with something like that.
Or with testing anything new in the base OS.
I can also test ports for both architectures mentioned in a short time.
Along with testing pieces of the base OS.
I am using FreeBSD on thre
I have to say I'm totally in the dark about what it is you're talking about
or asking... or pointing out. I'm not even sure what the i386 machine being
used for "studio, audio and DJ'ing" has to do with freebsd on ppc32. These
machines are fun to play with but you're not going to be able to run new
I have this laptop setup for i386 and can do testing of clang/llvm building
for a port, module, or otherwise.
On the side I have setup a laptop- i386 again- for a friend for
studio,audio and Dj'ing.
I'll get to the point.
I may be able to test things on i386 and PowerPC/PPC 32bit soon.
Then there
ah my miss interpretation sorry :)
On 03/05/2013, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 3 May 2013 08:31, Paul Webster wrote:
>> it was not really meant to be trolling I am sorry if you see it that
>> way; I just thought it was as my original posts state quite funny,
>> never thought it would would raise so m
Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated one of my -current machines this week (previous update
> was in
> february). Now I see a strange effect (it seems only on NFS mounts):
> ls or
> even echo * will list only some files (strange enough the first files
> from
> the normal, alphabetically or
Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> I checked. readdirsize is 64k.
>
Since the server replied with 4K, I suspect you are seeing the same
problem the other reporter has.
I'll email if/when I have more information on it.
> I will try to do a binary search for the problematic commit next week.
>
Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> On Fri, 3 May 2013, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>
> DB>I don't know about current, but on 9.1-stable, the nfsstat -m only
> works
> DB>for root! nfsstat can be run by anybody.
>
> Same for current. It silently prints nothing. Took me some time
> to figure out I should try as roo
Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've updated one of my -current machines this week (previous
> > > update
> > > was in
> > > february). Now I see a strange effect (it seems only on NFS
> > > mounts):
> > > ls or
> > > even echo * will list only some files (stra
On May 3, 2013, at 02:55, Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On May 2, 2013, at 20:28, Ryan Stone wrote:
>>> I am getting the following error when trying to build HEAD on an
>>> 8.1-RELEASE build machine (i386 jail on an amd64 host):
...
>> /usr/d2/users
On Friday, May 03, 2013 1:53:35 pm Alex Keda wrote:
> 03.05.2013 20:41, John Baldwin пишет:
> > On Thursday, May 02, 2013 4:18:45 pm Alex Keda wrote:
> >> see begin in:
> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-
November/038000.html
> >
> > Hmm, what I see is that hdac0 is affect
03.05.2013 20:41, John Baldwin пишет:
On Thursday, May 02, 2013 4:18:45 pm Alex Keda wrote:
see begin in:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-November/038000.html
Hmm, what I see is that hdac0 is affected by this, but it's a bit odd. Can
you try the patch below, but can yo
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, May 02, 2013 1:53:47 pm Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>> John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Thursday, May 02, 2013 7:25:08 am Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On 2 May 2013, at 11:42, Glen Barber wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hmm. Perhaps it wo
03.05.2013 20:41, John Baldwin пишет:
On Thursday, May 02, 2013 4:18:45 pm Alex Keda wrote:
see begin in:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-November/038000.html
Hmm, what I see is that hdac0 is affected by this, but it's a bit odd. Can
you try the patch below, but can yo
On Thursday, May 02, 2013 4:18:45 pm Alex Keda wrote:
> see begin in:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-November/038000.html
Hmm, what I see is that hdac0 is affected by this, but it's a bit odd. Can
you try the patch below, but can you also get the output of 'devinfo -u'
> Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've updated one of my -current machines this week (previous update
> > was in
> > february). Now I see a strange effect (it seems only on NFS mounts):
> > ls or
> > even echo * will list only some files (strange enough the first files
> > from
> > the norma
On Fri, 3 May 2013, Daniel Braniss wrote:
DB>I don't know about current, but on 9.1-stable, the nfsstat -m only works
DB>for root! nfsstat can be run by anybody.
Same for current. It silently prints nothing. Took me some time
to figure out I should try as root...
harti
__
Hi Rick,
I checked. readdirsize is 64k.
I will try to do a binary search for the problematic commit next week. For
this I had to do a local checkout (usually I have the system sources on
the file server and this fails, of course).
harti
On Fri, 3 May 2013, Rick Macklem wrote:
RM>Hartmut Bra
On 3 May 2013 08:31, Paul Webster wrote:
> it was not really meant to be trolling I am sorry if you see it that
> way; I just thought it was as my original posts state quite funny,
> never thought it would would raise so many follow up posts though :)
antibsd is the troll, not you.
--
Eitan A
it was not really meant to be trolling I am sorry if you see it that
way; I just thought it was as my original posts state quite funny,
never thought it would would raise so many follow up posts though :)
On 02/05/2013, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 2 May 2013 08:21, David Demelier wrote:
>> 2013/4/28
Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated one of my -current machines this week (previous update
> was in
> february). Now I see a strange effect (it seems only on NFS mounts):
> ls or
> even echo * will list only some files (strange enough the first files
> from
> the normal, alphabetically or
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Fourman Jr."
Hello list,
today I am trying to upgrade my fileserver, I was running a kernel based on
a then HEAD snapshot from sometime in late 2009..
I exported the ZFS dataset... booted from a current HEAD snapshot and I got
this error message...
ZFS
Hello list,
today I am trying to upgrade my fileserver, I was running a kernel based on
a then HEAD snapshot from sometime in late 2009..
I exported the ZFS dataset... booted from a current HEAD snapshot and I got
this error message...
ZFS filesystem version: 5
ZFS storage pool version: feature
28 matches
Mail list logo
