On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not being
built
and installed by default on HEAD.
If you are still relying on it, be careful
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:34:18PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
(kgdb) print runningbufreq
$1 = 1
(kgdb) print runningbufspace
$2 = 0
(kgdb) print lorunningspace
$3 = 4587520
(kgdb) print hirunningspace
$4 = 4194304
This is extremely weird. The
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:14:06AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:34:18PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
(kgdb) print runningbufreq
$1 = 1
(kgdb) print runningbufspace
$2 = 0
(kgdb) print lorunningspace
$3 = 4587520
(kgdb)
fwiw, nanobsd also is still on pkg_*, but I intend to come up with
patches for that if someone else has not already done so.
mcl
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
If you use dual-boot, please try cold-boot it. Other OS may have
put the PHY into weird state. Cold-boot shall make firmware restore
its PHY configuration.
Hello pyunyh,
when i really understand the word coldbootkorrekt,it means, that i have to
shutdown my pc.
And start it
On 12 Jul 2013, at 22:47, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Obviously not really fixed, but even worse:
if I use in C code (C99, using clang 3.3 on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64
revision 253287) isnan(x) where x is a const double, I receive now
the following error (which doesn't
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 06:11:11AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
fwiw, nanobsd also is still on pkg_*, but I intend to come up with
patches for that if someone else has not already done so.
mcl
There are lots of patches available everyone to have nanobsd using pkgng
I didn't commit any,
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 06:11:11AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
fwiw, nanobsd also is still on pkg_*, but I intend to come up with
patches for that if someone else has not already done so.
mcl
There are lots of
On 13.7.2013 13:12, David Chisnall wrote:
On 12 Jul 2013, at 22:47, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Obviously not really fixed, but even worse:
if I use in C code (C99, using clang 3.3 on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64
revision 253287) isnan(x) where x is a const double, I receive
Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 12.07.2013 12:56, Fabian Keil wrote:
Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10.07.2013 15:18, Fabian Keil wrote:
Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
It will give a bit of debug log output which is it telling you mostly about
On Jul 13, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not being built
and installed by default on HEAD.
If
Hi,
I see exactly the same error on pointyhat too, did you find any work around for
that?
On Jun 25, 2013, at 4:11 AM, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recently upgraded my main buildbox from an ancient 9.0-STABLE snapshot
to head and I've run into an issue building 9-STABLE on it.
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Yes. This state of affairs doesn't happen on r251445 and further
testing on my side shows it doesn't hapen on all my amd64 servers.
It appears that this particular server type (Dell R200) running
amd64 with geom_mirror is affected. I will have to test further
On Jul 13, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Jul 13, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 06:39:28PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Yes. This state of affairs doesn't happen on r251445 and further
testing on my side shows it doesn't hapen on all my amd64 servers.
It appears that this particular server type (Dell R200) running
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 13 июля 2013 г., 20:39:28:
IF So, then did r251446 actually start using this value or did other
IF values get significantly tuned up?
According to diff between 45 and 46 here are a lot of conditions on
hirunningspace in code now, which were absent in past.
--
// Black
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
So, then did r251446 actually start using this value or did other
values get significantly tuned up? I recall now setting this nearly
a year ago when we did our ZFS tuning and it was a four fold increase
on the defaults.
r251446 optimized the wakeups by only
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On Jul 13, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Jul 13, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste
On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com
wrote:
On Jul 13, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Jul 13, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +,
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:05:47 +0200
Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:26:06AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 12 Jul 2013, at 10:01, Lundberg, Johannes
johan...@brilliantservice.co.jp wrote:
As the KMS code does not switch the display mode back, once X
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, at 13:54, Teske, Devin wrote:
If FTP access (or any of the other remote access methods) are going away
for HEAD pkg access, I'll need to know so I can make the appropriate
changes in the HEAD branch of bsdconfig.
It's simpler than you think. The new pkg uses
On Jul 13, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, at 13:54, Teske, Devin wrote:
If FTP access (or any of the other remote access methods) are going away
for HEAD pkg access, I'll need to know so I can make the appropriate
changes in the HEAD branch of bsdconfig.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.comwrote:
Can you do an rquery on a local repository? (say, one that has been
mounted via NFS or some other media, local or otherwise but looking like a
local filesystem once-mounted). What would be required to get a local
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Teske, Devin
devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
So yes... I'm asking... in a HEAD world, what is the officially supported
method of acquisition?
This has been answered elsewhere, but to be absolutely clear:
* 10.0 will ship with pkgng format packages.
* pkgng
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Peter Wemm pe...@wemm.org wrote:
Footnote... *.cc.freebsd.org are generally project operated sites.
.. gah.. generally *NOT* project operated sites. They're third party
/ regional / local.
--
Peter Wemm - pe...@wemm.org; pe...@freebsd.org;
On Jul 13, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Teske, Devin
devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
So yes... I'm asking... in a HEAD world, what is the officially supported
method of acquisition?
This has been answered elsewhere, but to be absolutely clear:
On Jul 13, 2013, at 8:33 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Teske, Devin
devin.te...@fisglobal.commailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
Can you do an rquery on a local repository? (say, one that has been mounted
via NFS or some other media, local or otherwise but
27 matches
Mail list logo
