r264702: kldxref: /boot/modules/kldxref.core: too many sections

2014-04-21 Thread O. Hartmann
On FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r264702: Sun Apr 20 23:56:04 CEST 2014 amd64 I receive this mysterious message several times when compiling a new kernel an automatically build virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.3.10. What is this supposed to mean? === Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod ===

Re: r264702: kldxref: /boot/modules/kldxref.core: too many sections

2014-04-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 09:03:20AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: On FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r264702: Sun Apr 20 23:56:04 CEST 2014 amd64 I receive this mysterious message several times when compiling a new kernel an automatically build virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.3.10. What is this supposed to mean?

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2014-04-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2014-04-21 07:50:28 - tinderbox 2.21 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2014-04-21 07:50:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: UFS lock order reversal stack trace with r264677 on i386

2014-04-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014, R. Tyler Croy wrote: I've noticed this as of late on my i386 -CURRENT Thinkpad T43 when I perform some file operations, but an exact reproduction case I've not yet stumbled upon: Apr 20 01:29:32 lemon kernel: lock order reversal: Apr 20 01:29:32 lemon kernel: 1st

Build failures with high parallel make(1) jobs with GCC

2014-04-21 Thread Glen Barber
I have been pounding my head against the desk for longer than I care to admit with this failure. I see this with powerpc, powerpc64, and now ia64. I initially thought it was specific to powerpc{,64}, but now realize ia64 is also affected. This build was running with -j48 on a 48-core machine,

Re: Build failures with high parallel make(1) jobs with GCC

2014-04-21 Thread Ian Lepore
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 22:54 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: I have been pounding my head against the desk for longer than I care to admit with this failure. I see this with powerpc, powerpc64, and now ia64. I initially thought it was specific to powerpc{,64}, but now realize ia64 is also

Re: Build failures with high parallel make(1) jobs with GCC

2014-04-21 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 09:09:42PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: The last successful build for powerpc on head/ was April 8. But I am having trouble tracking down what commits may (or may not) have contributed to recent high-parallel build failures. A couple weeks corresponds somewhat with

Re: Build failures with high parallel make(1) jobs with GCC

2014-04-21 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:21:24PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 09:09:42PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: The last successful build for powerpc on head/ was April 8. But I am having trouble tracking down what commits may (or may not) have contributed to recent

Re: Build failures with high parallel make(1) jobs with GCC

2014-04-21 Thread Ian Lepore
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 23:26 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:21:24PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 09:09:42PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: The last successful build for powerpc on head/ was April 8. But I am having trouble tracking down what commits

Re: Build failures with high parallel make(1) jobs with GCC

2014-04-21 Thread Ian Lepore
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 23:26 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:21:24PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 09:09:42PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: The last successful build for powerpc on head/ was April 8. But I am having trouble tracking down what commits

Re: Build failures with high parallel make(1) jobs with GCC

2014-04-21 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:05:57PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 23:26 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:21:24PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 09:09:42PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: The last successful build for powerpc on head/ was