Hi,
A month has passed since the last e-mail on this topic, and in the
meanwhile some new patches have been created and tested:
Basically the approach has been changed a little bit:
- The creation of hardware transmit rings has been made independent of
the TCP stack. This allows firewall
Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz wrote:
da0 at umass-sim1 bus 1 scbus5 target 0 lun 0
da0: Android Adapter 0100 Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device
cd1 at umass-sim1 bus 1 scbus5 target 0 lun 1
cd1: Android Adapter 0100 Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device
da1 at umass-sim1 bus 1 scbus5
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Hi,
Any tips for Android / FreeBSD BSD tools for connectivity etc ?
I mainly use nfs / ssh (dropbear) / scp for connectivity over IPv6 to my
local FreeBSD server. It works quite well - I even have automated cron
rsync deduped backups!
NFS is used for
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org
wrote:
Hi,
A month has passed since the last e-mail on this topic, and in the
meanwhile some new patches have been created and tested:
Basically the approach has been changed a little bit:
- The creation of hardware
Hi Luigi,
On 08/20/14 11:32, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org
wrote:
Hi,
A month has passed since the last e-mail on this topic, and in the
meanwhile some new patches have been created and tested:
Basically the approach has been
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org
wrote:
Hi Luigi,
On 08/20/14 11:32, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org
wrote:
Hi,
A month has passed since the last e-mail on this topic, and in the
meanwhile
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org
wrote:
Hi Luigi,
On 08/20/14 11:32, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org
wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
respect LDFLAGS.
To enable, just add
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
cdevpriv(9) as happened with other drivers. This is mainly because we
On 8/20/14 11:00 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
cdevpriv(9) as happened
On 08/20/14 20:00, Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
cdevpriv(9) as happened
On 8/20/14, 11:00 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
cdevpriv(9) as happened
On Aug 20, 2014, at 11:05, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
On 8/20/14 11:00 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at
On 8/20/2014 1:13 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 8/20/14, 11:00 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my
On 08/20/14 00:34, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
A month has passed since the last e-mail on this topic, and in the
meanwhile some new patches have been created and tested:
Basically the approach has been changed a little bit:
- The creation of hardware transmit rings has been made
On 08/20/14 20:44, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On 08/20/14 00:34, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
A month has passed since the last e-mail on this topic, and in the
meanwhile some new patches have been created and tested:
Basically the approach has been changed a little bit:
- The creation of
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:00:14AM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
On 08/20/14 12:25, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 08/20/14 20:44, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On 08/20/14 00:34, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
A month has passed since the last e-mail on this topic, and in the
meanwhile some new patches have been created and tested:
Basically the approach has been
- uint32_t - m_flowid_t is plain gratuitous. Now we need to include
mbuf.h in more places just to get this definition. What's the
advantage of this? style(9) isn't too fond of typedefs either. Also,
drivers *do* need to know the width of the flowid. At least lagg(4)
looks
Hi,
Playing with GBDE for my FreeBSD disk book, on:
# uname -a
FreeBSD storm 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #6 r269010: Wed Jul 23 11:13:17
EDT 2014 mwlucas@storm:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
According to the man page, I should be able to destroy all copies of
the key with gbde
Sam Fourman Jr.
On Aug 20, 2014 1:00 PM, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding,
21 matches
Mail list logo
