See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/jenkins/job/FreeBSD_HEAD/1865/changes
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi,
The M_FLOWID flag is marked as deprecated in the FreeBSD kernel code and
the patch below completely removes it. I suggest we will now be using
the m_pkthdr.rsstype also known as M_HASHTYPE to decide if the
flowid value is valid or not. When the rsstype is set to
M_HASHTYPE_NONE the
Hm, how are we going to have the RSS stuff work at the same time as
the hardware flow steering stuff you're prototyping?
-adrian
On 19 November 2014 11:02, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
Hi,
The M_FLOWID flag is marked as deprecated in the FreeBSD kernel code and the
patch
On 11/19/14 20:23, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hm, how are we going to have the RSS stuff work at the same time as
the hardware flow steering stuff you're prototyping?
Hi Adrain,
RSS is only the receive side and its functionality is not touched. I'm
just re-using the RSS fields for the transmit
On 19 Nov 2014, at 20:02, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
Hi,
The M_FLOWID flag is marked as deprecated in the FreeBSD kernel code and the
patch below completely removes it. I suggest we will now be using the
m_pkthdr.rsstype also known as M_HASHTYPE to decide if the flowid
The RSS hash is also used for:
* TCP timers,
* UDP transmit, and
* the transmit path in RSS aware drivers (igb / ixgbe)
-adrian
On 19 November 2014 11:25, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 11/19/14 20:23, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hm, how are we going to have the RSS stuff work at
On 11/19/14 20:32, Adrian Chadd wrote:
The RSS hash is also used for:
* TCP timers,
* UDP transmit, and
* the transmit path in RSS aware drivers (igb / ixgbe)
I know, and the RSS flowid values are still preserved as before in the
receive path. It is just about how you tell the upper/lower
Hi Hans,
It mostly looks fine, but it's a large change and there are some
places in the patch where it isn't clear that the right thing is being
done by looking at the patch alone. Please give us some time to
review.
Thanks.
-K
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Hans Petter Selasky
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Mark Johnston ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
https://people.freebsd.org/~markj/patches/nd6_dad_races.diff
I haven't had the chance to study the patch in detail, but I can
confirm that it at least fixes the crashes that I was seeing earlier.
On 11/19/14 21:46, K. Macy wrote:
Hi Hans,
It mostly looks fine, but it's a large change and there are some
places in the patch where it isn't clear that the right thing is being
done by looking at the patch alone. Please give us some time to
review.
No problem. Do you think you need more
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 11/19/14 21:46, K. Macy wrote:
Hi Hans,
It mostly looks fine, but it's a large change and there are some
places in the patch where it isn't clear that the right thing is being
done by looking at the patch alone.
11 matches
Mail list logo