I have
device random # Entropy device
options RANDOM_YARROW
in my kernel config file. When rebuilding world, I'm
seeing
In file included from
/usr/src/sys/modules/random_fortuna/../../dev/random/randomdev.c:44:
/usr/src/sys/sys/random.h:39:2: error: Cannot define
a quick photo of the stack backtrace, since I didn't have time to
investigate further (but I haven't rebooted the machine yet, it's still
sitting at the db prompt:
http://mirror.vnode.se/upload/panic001-20150822.JPG
Any ideas?
--
Joel
___
freebsd-current
kernel paniced.
I took a quick photo of the stack backtrace, since I didn't have time to
investigate further (but I haven't rebooted the machine yet, it's still
sitting at the db prompt:
http://mirror.vnode.se/upload/panic001-20150822.JPG
Any ideas?
The panic is tcp_output: len
kernel paniced.
I took a quick photo of the stack backtrace, since I didn't have time to
investigate further (but I haven't rebooted the machine yet, it's still
sitting at the db prompt:
http://mirror.vnode.se/upload/panic001-20150822.JPG
Any ideas?
I'm going to guess that you're using
On 22 Aug 2015, at 06:03, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
Please fix.
On its way.
M
--
Mark R V Murray
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
I'm going to guess that you're using an em net driver, since that is the
only one that sets if_hw_tsomax IP_MAXPACKET (65535) from what I can see.
Sean, EM_TSO_SIZE is defined as (65535 + sizeof(struct ether_vlan_header)),
which makes it IP_MAXPACKET. The value of if_hw_tsomax must be =
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 02:13:18PM +0100, Mark R V Murray wrote:
On 22 Aug 2015, at 13:49, Mark R V Murray m...@grondar.org wrote:
On 22 Aug 2015, at 06:03, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
Please fix.
On its way.
Fixed.
A git commit was in the
On 22 Aug 2015, at 13:49, Mark R V Murray m...@grondar.org wrote:
On 22 Aug 2015, at 06:03, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
Please fix.
On its way.
Fixed.
A git commit was in the wrong review (D3197 instead of D3354). This is now
committed as svn commit
