Re: Inter-VLAN routing on CURRENT: any known issues?

Am Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:00:30 +0300 "Andrey V. Elsukov" schrieb: > On 14.07.2017 14:42, O. Hartmann wrote: > > I use in-kernel NAT. IPFW is performing NAT. In firewall type "OPEN" from > > the > > vanilla rc.conf, IPFW has instance "nat 123" which provides then NAT. > > I never used default co

Re: Inter-VLAN routing on CURRENT: any known issues?

On 14.07.2017 14:42, O. Hartmann wrote: > I use in-kernel NAT. IPFW is performing NAT. In firewall type "OPEN" from the > vanilla rc.conf, IPFW has instance "nat 123" which provides then NAT. I never used default config types for firewall, so, it would be nice to see what rules do you have. # ipf

Re: Inter-VLAN routing on CURRENT: any known issues?

Am Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:12:06 +0300 "Andrey V. Elsukov" schrieb: > On 12.07.2017 22:43, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Now the FUN PART: > > > > From any host in any VLAN I'm able to ping hosts on the wild internet via > > their IP, on VLAN 1000 there is a DNS running, so I'm also able to resolv > > name