Re: 11.1-jail on CURRENT: sh: lint: not found *** [llib-lposix.ln] Error code 127

There doesn't appear to be a knob to disable building lint for FreeBSD 11.x. Linking or copying /usr/bin/true to /usr/bin/lint works for cross building 11 on on a 12.0-CURRENT machine, but I was not able to get it to work when rebuilding a poudriere jail. On 8 Jan, Warner Losh wrote: > Does

Re: 11.1-jail on CURRENT: sh: lint: not found *** [llib-lposix.ln] Error code 127

Put the following in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/src.conf: LINT=/usr/bin/false That skips the attempt to build the lint library because of this: .if ${LINT} == "lint" _llib= llib .else _llib= .endif SUBDIR= lint1 lint2 xlint ${_llib} in /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/Makefile On 8 Jan,

Re: USB stack

[The involvement of sysutils/fusefs-simple-mtpfs and sysutils/fusefs-libs and multimedia/libmtp in order to use the Media Transfer Protocol (MTP) against the LG v30 likely explains much of the performance difference vs. local UFS file systems. I provide some related notes.] blubee blubeeme

Re: 11.1-jail on CURRENT: sh: lint: not found *** [llib-lposix.ln] Error code 127

Does building -DWITHOUT_LINT work? Or linking lint to /bin/true Warner On Jan 7, 2018 11:58 PM, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > We have a bunch of CURRENT boxes running poudriere jails providing > packages for > 11.1-RELENG. Since a couple of week sfor now, I face this error

11.1-jail on CURRENT: sh: lint: not found *** [llib-lposix.ln] Error code 127

We have a bunch of CURRENT boxes running poudriere jails providing packages for 11.1-RELENG. Since a couple of week sfor now, I face this error when I try to update the p3 and p4 to the recent p6: [...] cc -O2 -pipe -I/pool/poudriere/jails/11amd64/usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/xlint/../lint1

Re: USB stack

On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:17:22 +0800 "blubee blubeeme" said On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Jon Brawn wrote: > > > > On Jan 7, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Jon Brawn wrote: > > > > > >> On Jan 6, 2018, at 10:18 PM, blubee blubeeme

Re: Make periodic's output log to files if sendmail is disabled on install

On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 23:05:44 -0500 said 1) if sendmail is disabled during installation, have periodic's output logged to files (per example in https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?periodic(8) ) 2) make this the default anyway (logging to files), arguably the vast majority of

Re: USB stack

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Jon Brawn wrote: > > > > On Jan 7, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Jon Brawn wrote: > > > > > >> On Jan 6, 2018, at 10:18 PM, blubee blubeeme > wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Warner Losh

Re: r327359: cylinder checksum failed: cg0, cgp: 0x4515d2a3 != bp: 0xd9fba319 Dec 30 23:29:24 <0.2>

On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 12:31:34 +0100 "O. Hartmann" said Am Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:14:47 +0100 "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:10:37 +0100 > Michael Tuexen wrote: > > > > On 31. Dec 2017, at 02:45, Warner Losh

Make periodic's output log to files if sendmail is disabled on install

1) if sendmail is disabled during installation, have periodic's output logged to files (per example in https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?periodic(8) ) 2) make this the default anyway (logging to files), arguably the vast majority of systems' reporting is ignored :) At least now it could be

Re: status-mail-rejects: appears to be broken

On Sun, 07 Jan 2018 14:13:01 +0100 "Ronald Klop" said On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 20:50:23 +0100, Chris H wrote: > I'm running on r326056, and periodic(8) doesn't seem to be working > as expected; > mail rejects: > > Checking for rejected mail hosts: >

Re: r327359: cylinder checksum failed: cg0, cgp: 0x4515d2a3 != bp: 0xd9fba319 Dec 30 23:29:24 <0.2>

On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 12:31:34 +0100 "O. Hartmann" said Am Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:14:47 +0100 "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:10:37 +0100 > Michael Tuexen wrote: > > > > On 31. Dec 2017, at 02:45, Warner Losh

Re: USB stack

> On Jan 7, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Jon Brawn wrote: > > >> On Jan 6, 2018, at 10:18 PM, blubee blubeeme wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 8:56 PM, blubee blubeeme

Re: USB stack

> On Jan 6, 2018, at 10:18 PM, blubee blubeeme wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 8:56 PM, blubee blubeeme >> wrote: >> >>> I ask does FreeBSD usb stack actually

Re: Running FreeBSD on the Lenovo Thinkpad T470s (success)

On 7. Jan 2018, at 22:40, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> >> >> On 7. Jan 2018, at 21:32, Rodney W. Grimes >> wrote: >> >> On 7. Jan 2018, at 20:43, clutton wrote: >> >> On Sat,

Re: Running FreeBSD on the Lenovo Thinkpad T470s (success)

On 7. Jan 2018, at 21:32, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> >> On 7. Jan 2018, at 20:43, clutton wrote: On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 15:58 +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: Hi, >>> >>> Running carbon 5th gen I can't call my setup a

Re: Running FreeBSD on the Lenovo Thinkpad T470s (success)

> On 7. Jan 2018, at 20:43, clutton wrote: > >> On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 15:58 +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> Hi, > > Running carbon 5th gen I can't call my setup a success. Wireless iwm > doesn't support even N and AC is not supported at all. The wifi is much > slower then on

Re: USB stack

On 2018-Jan-7, at 10:23 AM, blubee blubeeme wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2018-Jan-7, at 7:50 AM, blubee blubeeme wrote: >> >> > I ran this test and here's some results. >> > gstat -pd images: >> > >> > 18GB file from laptop to phone:

newcons vs syscons

I'm curious why the new console driver vt doesn't have a vesa driver when the traditional syscons driver did. https://wiki.freebsd.org/Newcons Is there any specific reason why vesa driver wasn't implemented? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: USB stack

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > > On 2018-Jan-7, at 7:50 AM, blubee blubeeme wrote: > > > I ran this test and here's some results. > > gstat -pd images: > > > > 18GB file from laptop to phone: https://imgur.com/a/7iHwv > > 18GB file from laptop to ssd:

Re: partitioning schemes: GPT <-> MBR

On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 18:58 +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have 2 small virtual machines running in data center, on similar > hardware. Both are running FreeBSD 12-current. The first one is based > on a 10.3 image, upgraded to current. The second one is based on > 11.1, >

partitioning schemes: GPT <-> MBR

Hi guys, I have 2 small virtual machines running in data center, on similar hardware. Both are running FreeBSD 12-current. The first one is based on a 10.3 image, upgraded to current. The second one is based on 11.1, upgraded to current. I notice a difference in disk partitioning. 10.3 is using

Re: USB stack

On 2018-Jan-7, at 7:50 AM, blubee blubeeme wrote: > I ran this test and here's some results. > gstat -pd images: > > 18GB file from laptop to phone: https://imgur.com/a/7iHwv > 18GB file from laptop to ssd: https://imgur.com/a/40Q6V > multiple small files from laptop to phone:

Re: USB stack

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > [I add an example of a none-USB to USB2 copy and > a USB2 to non-USB copy. They do not show any > < 8 MiByte/s bottlenecks.] > > On 2018-Jan-7, at 3:42 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > > > [The other

Re: status-mail-rejects: appears to be broken

This looks the same as what I experienced. It will be fixed by upgrading until at least this commit: http://www.secnetix.de/olli/FreeBSD/svnews/index.py?r=326343 Ronald. On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 20:50:23 +0100, Chris H wrote: I'm running on r326056, and periodic(8)

Re: USB stack

[The other numbers show lots of delete activity on nvd0, not just primarily reads. Also: Can you test a different USB device, such as a USB SSD stick?] On 2018-Jan-7, at 2:44 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > [The following notes a problem with how a test was done. > I omit the rest of the material.] >

Re: USB stack

[I add an example of a none-USB to USB2 copy and a USB2 to non-USB copy. They do not show any < 8 MiByte/s bottlenecks.] On 2018-Jan-7, at 3:42 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > [The other numbers show lots of delete activity on nvd0, > not just primarily reads. Also: Can you test

Re: r327359: cylinder checksum failed: cg0, cgp: 0x4515d2a3 != bp: 0xd9fba319 Dec 30 23:29:24 <0.2>

Am Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:14:47 +0100 "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:10:37 +0100 > Michael Tuexen wrote: > > > > On 31. Dec 2017, at 02:45, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 4:41 PM, O. Hartmann

Re: USB stack

[The following notes a problem with how a test was done. I omit the rest of the material.] On 2018-Jan-7, at 2:09 AM, blubee blubeeme wrote: . . . > This is a larger file, not the largest but hey > > L(q) ops/sr/s kBps ms/rw/s kBps ms/wd/s kBps ms/d > %busy Name >

Re: USB stack

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > blubee blubeeme gurenchan at gmail.com wrote on > Wed Jan 3 10:31:56 UTC 2018 : > > > Does FreeBSD current USB stack support usb >= 2.0 devices? > > > > Testing out the USB devices support I get about 7.2-7.8 megabytes

Re: USB stack

blubee blubeeme gurenchan at gmail.com wrote on Wed Jan 3 10:31:56 UTC 2018 : > Does FreeBSD current USB stack support usb >= 2.0 devices? > > Testing out the USB devices support I get about 7.2-7.8 megabytes per > second which seems odd. FreeBSD machine: Pine64+ 2GB? Ryzen Threadripper 1950X?

Re: Re: USB stack

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > Forgot to include the list. Resending. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: "Freddie Cash" > Date: Jan 7, 2018 12:26 AM > Subject: Re: USB stack > To: "blubee blubeeme"

Fwd: Re: USB stack

Forgot to include the list. Resending. -- Forwarded message -- From: "Freddie Cash" Date: Jan 7, 2018 12:26 AM Subject: Re: USB stack To: "blubee blubeeme" Cc: On Jan 6, 2018 8:30 PM, "blubee blubeeme" wrote: > I