Re: [regression] The USB WiFi card stopped working: if_run doesn't create the 'run0' interface any more

2018-07-03 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] > On 07/03/18 15:29, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >>> wpa_supplicant_program="/usr/local/sbin/wpa_supplicant" > > ^^ > > > > What wpa_supplicant is this? > > The normal system one lives in /sbin. > > It's installed by

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread Pete Wright
On 07/03/2018 15:56, John Baldwin wrote: On 7/3/18 3:34 PM, Pete Wright wrote: On 07/03/2018 15:29, John Baldwin wrote: That seems like kgdb is looking at the wrong CPU. Can you use 'info threads' and look for threads not stopped in 'sched_switch' and get their backtraces? You could also

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread Matthew Macy
This seems like a clang inline asm bug. Could you try building the port with a recent gcc against an unpatched HEAD? On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 15:38 Pete Wright wrote: > > > On 07/03/2018 15:29, John Baldwin wrote: > > That seems like kgdb is looking at the wrong CPU. Can you use > > 'info

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 7/3/18 3:40 PM, Matthew Macy wrote: > This seems like a clang inline asm bug. Could you try building the port with > a recent gcc against an unpatched HEAD? I've already committed the patch to HEAD, but using 'e' is from the GCC docs, not clang docs:

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 7/3/18 3:34 PM, Pete Wright wrote: > > > On 07/03/2018 15:29, John Baldwin wrote: >> That seems like kgdb is looking at the wrong CPU. Can you use >> 'info threads' and look for threads not stopped in 'sched_switch' >> and get their backtraces? You could also just do 'thread apply >> all

Re: [regression] The USB WiFi card stopped working: if_run doesn't create the 'run0' interface any more

2018-07-03 Thread Yuri
On 07/03/18 15:29, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: wpa_supplicant_program="/usr/local/sbin/wpa_supplicant" ^^ What wpa_supplicant is this? The normal system one lives in /sbin. It's installed by the package wpa_supplicant-2.6_2 from security/wpa_supplicant. It

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread Pete Wright
On 07/03/2018 15:29, John Baldwin wrote: That seems like kgdb is looking at the wrong CPU. Can you use 'info threads' and look for threads not stopped in 'sched_switch' and get their backtraces? You could also just do 'thread apply all bt' and put that file at a URL if that is easiest.

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 7/3/18 3:20 PM, Pete Wright wrote: > > > On 07/03/2018 15:12, Pete Wright wrote: >> >> >> On 07/03/2018 14:17, Pete Wright wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 07/03/2018 12:02, John Baldwin wrote: On 7/3/18 11:28 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 07/03/18 17:02, O. Hartmann wrote: >> -BEGIN

Re: [regression] The USB WiFi card stopped working: if_run doesn't create the 'run0' interface any more

2018-07-03 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> On 07/03/18 14:32, Yuri wrote: > > > > > > rc.conf has: > > > > wlans_iwn0="wlan0" > > > > ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP" > > > > wpa_supplicant_enable="YES" > > > > wpa_supplicant_program="/usr/local/sbin/wpa_supplicant" ^^ What wpa_supplicant is this? The normal

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread Pete Wright
On 07/03/2018 15:12, Pete Wright wrote: On 07/03/2018 14:17, Pete Wright wrote: On 07/03/2018 12:02, John Baldwin wrote: On 7/3/18 11:28 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: On 07/03/18 17:02, O. Hartmann wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:19:57 -0400

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread Pete Wright
On 07/03/2018 14:17, Pete Wright wrote: On 07/03/2018 12:02, John Baldwin wrote: On 7/3/18 11:28 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: On 07/03/18 17:02, O. Hartmann wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:19:57 -0400 Michael Butler schrieb: It seems recent

Re: [regression] The USB WiFi card stopped working: if_run doesn't create the 'run0' interface any more

2018-07-03 Thread Yuri
On 07/03/18 14:32, Yuri wrote: rc.conf has: wlans_iwn0="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP" wpa_supplicant_enable="YES" wpa_supplicant_program="/usr/local/sbin/wpa_supplicant" This got mixed up. rc.conf has: wlans_run0="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA SYNCDHCP" wpa_supplicant_enable="YES"

Re: [regression] The USB WiFi card stopped working: if_run doesn't create the 'run0' interface any more

2018-07-03 Thread Yuri
On 07/03/18 13:54, Sean Bruno wrote: Yuri: If you're still having trouble, dump your rc.conf entries for your wireless. Mine looks like this at the moment with iwn(4): wlans_iwn0="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP" seam Thank you, Sean! rc.conf has: wlans_iwn0="wlan0"

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread Pete Wright
On 07/03/2018 12:02, John Baldwin wrote: On 7/3/18 11:28 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: On 07/03/18 17:02, O. Hartmann wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:19:57 -0400 Michael Butler schrieb: It seems recent changes (SVN r335873?) may have broken

Re: [regression] The USB WiFi card stopped working: if_run doesn't create the 'run0' interface any more

2018-07-03 Thread Sean Bruno
On 07/03/18 13:53, Yuri wrote: > On 07/03/18 12:50, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >>   No, it isn't. >> >>   >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless/2016-October/007232.html >> >> >>   I don't know, why is it not mentioned in UPDATING:-( > > > I may be mistaken about the interface

Re: [regression] The USB WiFi card stopped working: if_run doesn't create the 'run0' interface any more

2018-07-03 Thread Yuri
On 07/03/18 12:50, Lev Serebryakov wrote: No, it isn't. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless/2016-October/007232.html I don't know, why is it not mentioned in UPDATING:-( I may be mistaken about the interface creation. But regardless of the cause, WiFi doesn't work

Re: [regression] The USB WiFi card stopped working: if_run doesn't create the 'run0' interface any more

2018-07-03 Thread Lev Serebryakov
On 03.07.2018 22:45, Yuri wrote: > I updated the laptop to r335884 last night, and 'service wpa_supplicant > start wlan0' doesn't succeed any more. > > kernel is supposed to create the network interface 'run0', but it > doesn't. This is the immediate reason why wpa_supplicant fails. > > The

[regression] The USB WiFi card stopped working: if_run doesn't create the 'run0' interface any more

2018-07-03 Thread Yuri
I updated the laptop to r335884 last night, and 'service wpa_supplicant start wlan0' doesn't succeed any more. kernel is supposed to create the network interface 'run0', but it doesn't. This is the immediate reason why wpa_supplicant fails. The non-creation of 'run0' is a regression. I don't

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/03/2018 15:23, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 07/03/2018 15:02, John Baldwin wrote: >> On 7/3/18 11:28 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: >>> On 07/03/18 17:02, O. Hartmann wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Tue, 3 Jul

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On 07/03/2018 15:02, John Baldwin wrote: > On 7/3/18 11:28 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> On 07/03/18 17:02, O. Hartmann wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA512 >>> >>> Am Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:19:57 -0400 >>> Michael Butler schrieb: >>> It seems recent changes (SVN

Re: em0 link fail

2018-07-03 Thread Michael Butler
On 7/3/18 14:47, I wrote: > On 07/03/18 14:31, Sean Bruno wrote: >> >> >> On 07/03/18 11:47, Michael Butler wrote: >>> On June 1st, I was able to do my monthly laptop ZFS snap-shot/back-up >>> (using "zfs snapshot -r zroot@backup; zfs send -R >nfs-filesys"). Now I >>> can't without the em0

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 7/3/18 11:28 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 07/03/18 17:02, O. Hartmann wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> Am Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:19:57 -0400 >> Michael Butler schrieb: >> >>> It seems recent changes (SVN r335873?) may have broken drm-next-kmod .. >>> >>> ---

Re: em0 link fail

2018-07-03 Thread Michael Butler
On 07/03/18 14:31, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > On 07/03/18 11:47, Michael Butler wrote: >> On June 1st, I was able to do my monthly laptop ZFS snap-shot/back-up >> (using "zfs snapshot -r zroot@backup; zfs send -R >nfs-filesys"). Now I >> can't without the em0 interface stalling :-( >> > > Can you

Re: em0 link fail

2018-07-03 Thread Sean Bruno
On 07/03/18 11:47, Michael Butler wrote: > On June 1st, I was able to do my monthly laptop ZFS snap-shot/back-up > (using "zfs snapshot -r zroot@backup; zfs send -R >nfs-filesys"). Now I > can't without the em0 interface stalling :-( > Can you tell what version of FreeBSD SVN was in use on

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 07/03/18 17:02, O. Hartmann wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:19:57 -0400 Michael Butler schrieb: It seems recent changes (SVN r335873?) may have broken drm-next-kmod .. --- i915_drv.o --- In file included from i915_drv.c:30: In file included

Re: em0 link fail

2018-07-03 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > On June 1st, I was able to do my monthly laptop ZFS snap-shot/back-up > (using "zfs snapshot -r zroot@backup; zfs send -R >nfs-filesys"). Now I > can't without the em0 interface stalling :-( I had a similar case on a current r334918 and saw this in the kern syslog: Jun 30 15:40:34 fc

Re: svn commit: r335879 - in head/sys: conf kern sys [ broke ci.freebsd.org's FreeBSD-head-amd64-build ]

2018-07-03 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Jul-3, at 10:06 AM, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 5:30 PM Bryan Drewery wrote: >> >> On 7/2/2018 10:46 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >>> -r335879 broke ci.freebsd.org's FreeBSD-head-amd64-build : >>> >>> https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-build/ >>> >>> shows:

em0 link fail

2018-07-03 Thread Michael Butler
On June 1st, I was able to do my monthly laptop ZFS snap-shot/back-up (using "zfs snapshot -r zroot@backup; zfs send -R >nfs-filesys"). Now I can't without the em0 interface stalling :-( On a guess, I tried reverting SVN r335303 but that didn't help. em0: port 0xf080-0xf09f mem

Re: svn commit: r335879 - in head/sys: conf kern sys [ broke ci.freebsd.org's FreeBSD-head-amd64-build ]

2018-07-03 Thread Li-Wen Hsu
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 5:30 PM Bryan Drewery wrote: > > On 7/2/2018 10:46 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > > -r335879 broke ci.freebsd.org's FreeBSD-head-amd64-build : > > > > https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-build/ > > > > shows: > > > > --- ia32_genassym.o --- > > In file included from

Re: svn commit: r335879 - in head/sys: conf kern sys [ broke ci.freebsd.org's FreeBSD-head-amd64-build ]

2018-07-03 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 7/2/2018 10:46 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > -r335879 broke ci.freebsd.org's FreeBSD-head-amd64-build : > > https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-build/ > > shows: > > --- ia32_genassym.o --- > In file included from /usr/src/sys/compat/ia32/ia32_genassym.c:6: > In file included from

Re: atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread O. Hartmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:19:57 -0400 Michael Butler schrieb: > It seems recent changes (SVN r335873?) may have broken drm-next-kmod .. > > --- i915_drv.o --- > In file included from i915_drv.c:30: > In file included from >

atomic changes break drm-next-kmod?

2018-07-03 Thread Michael Butler
It seems recent changes (SVN r335873?) may have broken drm-next-kmod .. --- i915_drv.o --- In file included from i915_drv.c:30: In file included from /usr/ports/graphics/drm-next-kmod/work/kms-drm-a753215/linuxkpi/gplv2/include/linux/acpi.h:26: In file included from