CURRENT r338641 with poudriere-devel: seg fault on building x11/kde-workspace-kde4

2018-09-20 Thread Matthias Apitz
matthias =>> Building x11/kde-workspace-kde4 build started at Fri Sep 21 05:23:49 CEST 2018 port directory: /usr/ports/x11/kde-workspace-kde4 package name: kde-workspace-kde4-4.11.22_26 building for: FreeBSD freebsd-r338641-ports-20180920-job-03 12.0-ALPHA5 FreeBSD 12.0-ALPHA5 1

Use of cbp->tbd[-1].tb_size in /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c : clang 7 rejects it

2018-09-20 Thread Mark Millard
The sources listed here are from head -r338675 . /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxpreg.h:297 is in: struct fxp_cb_tx { uint16_t cb_status; uint16_t cb_command; uint32_t link_addr; uint32_t tbd_array_addr; uint16_t byte_count; uint8_t tx_threshold;

Re: 12.0-ALPHA6 dumps with 'Fatal double fault'

2018-09-20 Thread Michael Schmiedgen
Port is devel/apr1 and platform is amd64. Works fine on my side. It would be helpful if you could build a kernel with debug symbols, reproduce the problem and provide a stack strace. Unfortunately I cannot. It is a production machine without debug that does not like to run on 11.1 OR 11.2

Re: 12.0-ALPHA6 dumps with 'Fatal double fault'

2018-09-20 Thread Michael Tuexen
> On 20. Sep 2018, at 19:11, Michael Schmiedgen wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > many thanks for your help. > > > On 20.09.2018 18:15, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>> On 20. Sep 2018, at 17:12, Michael Schmiedgen wrote: >>> >>> Can you elaborate which port was triggering the fault and which

Re: 12.0-ALPHA6 dumps with 'Fatal double fault'

2018-09-20 Thread Michael Schmiedgen
Hi Michael, many thanks for your help. On 20.09.2018 18:15, Michael Tuexen wrote: On 20. Sep 2018, at 17:12, Michael Schmiedgen wrote: Can you elaborate which port was triggering the fault and which platform you are using? I would like to reproduce the issue and fix it. Port is

Re: 12.0-ALPHA6 dumps with 'Fatal double fault'

2018-09-20 Thread Michael Tuexen
> On 20. Sep 2018, at 17:12, Michael Schmiedgen wrote: > > >> Can you elaborate which port was triggering the fault and which platform you >> are using? >> I would like to reproduce the issue and fix it. > > Port is devel/apr1 and platform is amd64. Works fine on my side. It would be helpful

Re: 12.0-ALPHA6 dumps with 'Fatal double fault'

2018-09-20 Thread Michael Schmiedgen
Can you elaborate which port was triggering the fault and which platform you are using? I would like to reproduce the issue and fix it. Port is devel/apr1 and platform is amd64. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31245 @ 3.30GHz (3300.10-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin="GenuineIntel" Id=0x206a7

Re: 12.0-ALPHA6 dumps with 'Fatal double fault'

2018-09-20 Thread Michael Tuexen
> On 20. Sep 2018, at 14:18, Michael Schmiedgen wrote: > > Hi List, > > if compiling ports and configure script checks for SCTP with > > 'checking whether SCTP is supported...' > > 12.0-ALPHA6 dumps core with message: > > Fatal double fault > rip 0x80b96297 rsp 0xfe00be241bb0 rbp

Re: 12.0-ALPHA6 dumps with 'Fatal double fault'

2018-09-20 Thread Michael Schmiedgen
I removed SCTP from kernel and updated from r338797 to r338827 and the problem seems to be gone. Michael On 20.09.2018 14:18, Michael Schmiedgen wrote: Hi List, if compiling ports and configure script checks for SCTP with 'checking whether SCTP is supported...' 12.0-ALPHA6 dumps core with

12.0-ALPHA6 dumps with 'Fatal double fault'

2018-09-20 Thread Michael Schmiedgen
Hi List, if compiling ports and configure script checks for SCTP with 'checking whether SCTP is supported...' 12.0-ALPHA6 dumps core with message: Fatal double fault rip 0x80b96297 rsp 0xfe00be241bb0 rbp 0xfe00be245490 rax 0x1 rdx 0x3 rbx 0x7fffd198 rcx 0x80b9620b

Re: udp6: Page fault panics

2018-09-20 Thread Michael Butler
On 9/17/18 4:17 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 16.09.2018 03:04, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> vpanic() at vpanic+0x1a3/frame 0xfe00ca17c150 >> panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfe00ca17c1b0 >> trap_fatal() at trap_fatal+0x35f/frame 0xfe00ca17c200 >> trap_pfault() at trap_pfault+0x49/frame

Re: FreeBSD EFI projects

2018-09-20 Thread Greg V
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Rebecca Cran wrote: On 9/19/18 3:53 AM, Greg V wrote: Yes, of course it was 64-bit. I don't think I ever downloaded the 32-bit one... And are you sure it was booted via EFI and not the BIOS emulation CSM (Compatibility Support Module)? I'm fairly