The following sort of sequence leads to the Rock64 not
responding on the console or over ethernet, after notifying
of nmbclusters having been reached. (This limits what
information I have of what things were like at the end.)
This is for a head -r356066 based non-debug-build context.
The
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 08:42:53PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 07:00:04PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:47:17PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patch now includes a fix for hexadecimal conversion. It
> > > >
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 07:00:04PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:47:17PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:25:30PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > > The use of OpenSSL in factor(6) breaks factor(6) with respect to
> > > > > its
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 07:00:04PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:47:17PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:25:30PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > The use of OpenSSL in factor(6) breaks factor(6) with respect to
> > > > its documentation.
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 02:42:12PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:47:17PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:25:30PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > The use of OpenSSL in factor(6) breaks factor(6) with respect to
> > > > its documentation.
> >
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:47:17PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:25:30PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > The use of OpenSSL in factor(6) breaks factor(6) with respect to
> > > its documentation.
> > >
> > > % man factor
> > > ...
> > > Numbers may be preceded by a
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 02:42:12PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:47:17PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:25:30PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > The use of OpenSSL in factor(6) breaks factor(6) with respect to
> > > its documentation.
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:47:17PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:25:30PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > The use of OpenSSL in factor(6) breaks factor(6) with respect to
> > its documentation.
> >
> > % man factor
> > ...
> > Numbers may be preceded by a single '+'.
> >
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:25:30PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> The use of OpenSSL in factor(6) breaks factor(6) with respect to
> its documentation.
>
> % man factor
> ...
> Numbers may be preceded by a single '+'.
> ...
>
> % factor +125
> factor: +125: illegal numeric format.
>
This
The use of OpenSSL in factor(6) breaks factor(6) with respect to
its documentation.
% man factor
...
Numbers may be preceded by a single '+'.
...
% factor +125
factor: +125: illegal numeric format.
without OpenSSL one gets
% factor +125
125: 5 5 5
Although undocumented, factor(6) seems
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 08:36:34PM +, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I withdraw the patch. One can get a negative start
> > value, but one would need to force that condition via
> > a subversion via getopt.
>
> Or:
>
> primes -- -1 5
Ah, yeah, that's what I
Steve Kargl wrote:
> Hmm, I withdraw the patch. One can get a negative start
> value, but one would need to force that condition via
> a subversion via getopt.
Or:
primes -- -1 5
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 09:55:10AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> This patch removes an unnecessary check as
> the condition can never occur.
>
> Index: primes.c
> ===
> --- primes.c (revision 355983)
> +++ primes.c (working copy)
>
This patch removes an unnecessary check as
the condition can never occur.
Index: primes.c
===
--- primes.c(revision 355983)
+++ primes.c(working copy)
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
switch (argc) {
case 2:
14 matches
Mail list logo
