On 12/16/2021 9:03 pm, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 12/10/2021 10:43 am, Larry Rosenman wrote:
14-2021_12_07-1217 - - 1.87G 2021-12-07
12:17
14-2021_12_09-1957 NR / 121G 2021-12-09
19:57
If that's any help
On 12/10/2021 10:36 am, Alexander
On 12/10/2021 10:43 am, Larry Rosenman wrote:
14-2021_12_07-1217 - - 1.87G 2021-12-07 12:17
14-2021_12_09-1957 NR / 121G 2021-12-09 19:57
If that's any help
On 12/10/2021 10:36 am, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi Larry,
This looks like some
In recent months, what (if anything) changed to improve things for users
of iwn(4)?
Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 [Taylor Peak] here. At home, previously I
typically got less than 9 (download), now I get more than 70 Mbps.
(I see last month's
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 07:53:10AM -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> P.S. If you really wish to deprecate something, I can suggest you to
T> sacrifice sbni(4) :)
P.P.S.
The driver actually provides a historical example: a driver removed,
later appeared not only used by somebody but even having a
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 09:30:41AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
W> > E> And we're doing that just because the drivers compiles ?
W> > G> We are doing that because the hardware is still produced ...
W> > E> ... a lot of obsolete hardware that we've removed are still produced ...
W> > G> I'd be
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 8:54 AM Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Emmanuel,
>
> look at this communication:
>
> E> And we're doing that just because the drivers compiles ?
> G> We are doing that because the hardware is still produced ...
> E> ... a lot of obsolete hardware that we've removed are still
Emmanuel,
look at this communication:
E> And we're doing that just because the drivers compiles ?
G> We are doing that because the hardware is still produced ...
E> ... a lot of obsolete hardware that we've removed are still produced ...
G> I'd be interested to see at least one example ...
E>
On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 07:01:30 -0800
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Emmanuel,
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:17:33AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> E> > E> I'm not sure I understand the logic here.
> E> > E> We're keeping drivers for museum grade hardware that no developer
> have
> E> > E> access to
Emmanuel,
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:17:33AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
E> > E> I'm not sure I understand the logic here.
E> > E> We're keeping drivers for museum grade hardware that no developer have
E> > E> access to and likely no one uses nowadays just for an hypothetical
E> > E>
On 15 Dec 2021, at 18:44, FreeBSD User wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 19:41:07 +1030
> Daniel O'Connor via freebsd-current wrote:
>>> On 25 Nov 2021, at 18:50, FreeBSD User wrote:
...
>
>>> Since then named is crashing with a mysterious segmentation fault (see PR
>>> 259921,
>>>
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:11:16 -0800
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 05:52:02PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> E> > > I've noticed this /sbin/sconfig binary and after looking it's for
> E> > > configuring Cronyx E1 PCI (PCI as in PCI, not PCIe).
> E> > > The products pages ([1],
On 12/15/21 23:58, Mark Millard via freebsd-current wrote:
Back when I upgraded the ThreadRipper 1950X amd64 system to (line split for
readability):
# uname -apKU
FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #25
main-n251456-22c4ab6cb015-dirty:
Tue Dec 7 19:38:53 PST 2021
12 matches
Mail list logo
