mention AF_NETLINK in man 2 socket

2023-01-11 Thread User Ngor
Looks like there are no references to {PF|AF}_NETLINK in the socket manpage. -- Ihor Antonov

Re: Build failure: main-n259988-48dc9150ac36 -> main-n260011-40bb52c89b87

2023-01-11 Thread Warner Losh
looks like we may need another 'unclean' workaround for this? Warner On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 6:32 AM Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 04:05:43 -0800 > David Wolfskill wrote: > > > Running: > > FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #275 > main-n259988-48d

Re: Build failure: main-n259988-48dc9150ac36 -> main-n260011-40bb52c89b87

2023-01-11 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 04:05:43 -0800 David Wolfskill wrote: > Running: > FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #275 > main-n259988-48dc9150ac36: Tue Jan 10 12:20:47 UTC 2023 > r...@freebeast.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC > amd64 >

Build failure: main-n259988-48dc9150ac36 -> main-n260011-40bb52c89b87

2023-01-11 Thread David Wolfskill
Running: FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #275 main-n259988-48dc9150ac36: Tue Jan 10 12:20:47 UTC 2023 r...@freebeast.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 and performing an in-place source update to main-n260011-40bb52c89b87 u