Re: /lib/libc.so.7 vs. __libc_start1@FBSD_1.7 in main [so: 14] recently ?

2023-04-23 Thread Mark Millard
[Warner answered my specific question separately. This is about something else.] On Apr 23, 2023, at 20:57, Warner Losh wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 9:40 PM Simon J. Gerraty wrote: >> Mark Millard wrote: >> > I will not get into why, but I executed a git built for 1400082 >> > in a

Re: /lib/libc.so.7 vs. __libc_start1@FBSD_1.7 in main [so: 14] recently ?

2023-04-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 9:09 PM Mark Millard wrote: > I will not get into why, but I executed a git built for 1400082 > in a 1400081 world context and got what was to me a surprise, > given that /lib/libc.so.7 is part of 13.2-RELEASE : > > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/git: Undefined symbol

Re: /lib/libc.so.7 vs. __libc_start1@FBSD_1.7 in main [so: 14] recently ?

2023-04-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 9:40 PM Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > Mark Millard wrote: > > I will not get into why, but I executed a git built for 1400082 > > in a 1400081 world context and got what was to me a surprise, > > given that /lib/libc.so.7 is part of 13.2-RELEASE : > > > > ld-elf.so.1:

Re: /lib/libc.so.7 vs. __libc_start1@FBSD_1.7 in main [so: 14] recently ?

2023-04-23 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Mark Millard wrote: > I will not get into why, but I executed a git built for 1400082 > in a 1400081 world context and got what was to me a surprise, > given that /lib/libc.so.7 is part of 13.2-RELEASE : > > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/git: Undefined symbol "__libc_start1@FBSD_1.7" This is a

/lib/libc.so.7 vs. __libc_start1@FBSD_1.7 in main [so: 14] recently ?

2023-04-23 Thread Mark Millard
I will not get into why, but I executed a git built for 1400082 in a 1400081 world context and got what was to me a surprise, given that /lib/libc.so.7 is part of 13.2-RELEASE : ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/git: Undefined symbol "__libc_start1@FBSD_1.7" Does this mean that a /lib/libc.so.8 is

Re: ntpd fails on recent -current/arm64

2023-04-23 Thread Mark Johnston
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 09:47:01PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Somewhere between c283016-g607bc91d90a3 and c283077-g7f658f99f7ed, > some change in the kernel has made ntpd stop working on my arm64 test > box. (My amd64 test box is a couple of days behind so I'm not sure if > it's arm-specific).

Re: ntpd fails on recent -current/arm64

2023-04-23 Thread Mark Johnston
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 07:34:45AM -0500, Mike Karels wrote: > On 23 Apr 2023, at 6:47, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > Somewhere between c283016-g607bc91d90a3 and c283077-g7f658f99f7ed, > > some change in the kernel has made ntpd stop working on my arm64 test > > box. (My amd64 test box is a couple

Re: ntpd fails on recent -current/arm64

2023-04-23 Thread Michael Butler
On 4/23/23 07:47, Peter Jeremy wrote: Somewhere between c283016-g607bc91d90a3 and c283077-g7f658f99f7ed, some change in the kernel has made ntpd stop working on my arm64 test box. (My amd64 test box is a couple of days behind so I'm not sure if it's arm-specific). [ .. snip .. ] While I

Re: ntpd fails on recent -current/arm64

2023-04-23 Thread Mark Millard
On Apr 23, 2023, at 05:29, Mark Millard wrote: > Peter Jeremy write on > Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 11:47:01 UTC : > >> Somewhere between c283016-g607bc91d90a3 and c283077-g7f658f99f7ed, > > I see the problem at main-n262371-72ef722b2a34-dirty (aarch64), > in the middle of your range. So in the

Re: ntpd fails on recent -current/arm64

2023-04-23 Thread Mike Karels
On 23 Apr 2023, at 6:47, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Somewhere between c283016-g607bc91d90a3 and c283077-g7f658f99f7ed, > some change in the kernel has made ntpd stop working on my arm64 test > box. (My amd64 test box is a couple of days behind so I'm not sure if > it's arm-specific). > > What I've

RE: ntpd fails on recent -current/arm64

2023-04-23 Thread Mark Millard
Peter Jeremy write on Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 11:47:01 UTC : > Somewhere between c283016-g607bc91d90a3 and c283077-g7f658f99f7ed, I see the problem at main-n262371-72ef722b2a34-dirty (aarch64), in the middle of your range. So in the smaller range is: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 . . . • git:

ntpd fails on recent -current/arm64

2023-04-23 Thread Peter Jeremy
Somewhere between c283016-g607bc91d90a3 and c283077-g7f658f99f7ed, some change in the kernel has made ntpd stop working on my arm64 test box. (My amd64 test box is a couple of days behind so I'm not sure if it's arm-specific). What I've identified so far: * The problem is in the kernel, not