Re: Possible issue with linux xattr support?

2023-09-04 Thread Felix Palmen
* Dmitry Chagin [20230904 21:49]: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 08:43:02PM +0200, Felix Palmen wrote: > > I guess I'll now do a full rebuild of my linuxulator userspace branch on > > a kernel with that patch, just to be sure it won't break anything else, > > this will take a few

Re: An attempted test of main's "git: 2ad756a6bbb3" "merge openzfs/zfs@95f71c019" that did not go as planned

2023-09-04 Thread Mark Millard
On Sep 4, 2023, at 18:39, Mark Millard wrote: > On Sep 4, 2023, at 10:05, Alexander Motin wrote: > >> On 04.09.2023 11:45, Mark Millard wrote: >>> On Sep 4, 2023, at 06:09, Alexander Motin wrote: per_txg_dirty_frees_percent is directly related to the delete delays we see here. You

Re: An attempted test of main's "git: 2ad756a6bbb3" "merge openzfs/zfs@95f71c019" that did not go as planned

2023-09-04 Thread Mark Millard
On Sep 4, 2023, at 10:05, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 04.09.2023 11:45, Mark Millard wrote: >> On Sep 4, 2023, at 06:09, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> per_txg_dirty_frees_percent is directly related to the delete delays we see >>> here. You are forcing ZFS to commit transactions each 5% of

FYI: ^T use during poudriere bulk vs. /bin/sh operation: I got a "Unsafe ckmalloc() call" Abort trap that left a mess

2023-09-04 Thread Mark Millard
During a (zfs based) poudriere bulk -a run a ^T got a: Unsafe ckmalloc() call Abort trap (core dumped) from /bin/sh . AT that point it had built something like 350 ports into packages in .building/ . After the last finish was reported for the already building ports, I killed 2 stuck poudriere

Re: Possible issue with linux xattr support?

2023-09-04 Thread Felix Palmen
* Dmitry Chagin [20230904 21:49]: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 08:43:02PM +0200, Felix Palmen wrote: > > Thanks a lot for the quick patch! I have to admit I don't fully > > understand it immediately, but I assume it's an attempt to only list > > attributes not in system.

Re: Possible issue with linux xattr support?

2023-09-04 Thread Dmitry Chagin
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 08:43:02PM +0200, Felix Palmen wrote: > Hello Dmitry, > > * Dmitry Chagin [20230904 21:29]: > > Thanks for the report, > > please, try this: https://people.freebsd.org/~dchagin/lxattr.patch > > Don't be surprised, there 2 fixes > > Th

Re: Possible issue with linux xattr support?

2023-09-04 Thread Felix Palmen
Hello Dmitry, * Dmitry Chagin [20230904 21:29]: > Thanks for the report, > please, try this: https://people.freebsd.org/~dchagin/lxattr.patch > Don't be surprised, there 2 fixes Thanks a lot for the quick patch! I have to admit I don't fully understand it immediately, but I as

Re: Possible issue with linux xattr support?

2023-09-04 Thread Dmitry Chagin
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 04:03:54PM +0200, Felix Palmen wrote: > * Felix Palmen [20230904 15:39]: > > For some reason (I still have to try to get more information about it, > > will do soon), something else is broken now. While install from GNU > > coreutils works fine, some

Re: 14.0-CURRENT boots fine but keyboard does not work

2023-09-04 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023, 11:40 AM Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On 4. Sep 2023, at 19:34, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > El día lunes, septiembre 04, 2023 a las 07:29:41p. m. +0200, Michael > Gmelin escribió: > > > > On 4. Sep 2023, at 19:23, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > >  > > Added Alexander Motin to

Re: 14.0-CURRENT boots fine but keyboard does not work

2023-09-04 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 4. Sep 2023, at 19:34, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > El día lunes, septiembre 04, 2023 a las 07:29:41p. m. +0200, Michael Gmelin > escribió: > >> >> On 4. Sep 2023, at 19:23, Matthias Apitz wrote: >>> >>>  >>> Added Alexander Motin to To: as the origin of the CI; >>> >>>

Re: 14.0-CURRENT boots fine but keyboard does not work

2023-09-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día lunes, septiembre 04, 2023 a las 07:29:41p. m. +0200, Michael Gmelin escribió: > > > > On 4. Sep 2023, at 19:23, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > >  > > Added Alexander Motin to To: as the origin of the CI; > > > > Neither hw.atkbd.hz=1 nor hw.atkbd.hz=10 makes the keyboard working on >

Re: 14.0-CURRENT boots fine but keyboard does not work

2023-09-04 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 4. Sep 2023, at 19:23, Matthias Apitz wrote: > >  > Added Alexander Motin to To: as the origin of the CI; > > Neither hw.atkbd.hz=1 nor hw.atkbd.hz=10 makes the keyboard working on > my beloved Acer C720. Should I file a new PR? > Filing a PR makes sense, could you please Cc me on

Re: 14.0-CURRENT boots fine but keyboard does not work

2023-09-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
Added Alexander Motin to To: as the origin of the CI; Neither hw.atkbd.hz=1 nor hw.atkbd.hz=10 makes the keyboard working on my beloved Acer C720. Should I file a new PR? Thanks matthias El día lunes, septiembre 04, 2023 a las 06:55:52p. m. +0200, Michael Gmelin escribió: > > >

Re: An attempted test of main's "git: 2ad756a6bbb3" "merge openzfs/zfs@95f71c019" that did not go as planned

2023-09-04 Thread Alexander Motin
On 04.09.2023 11:45, Mark Millard wrote: On Sep 4, 2023, at 06:09, Alexander Motin wrote: per_txg_dirty_frees_percent is directly related to the delete delays we see here. You are forcing ZFS to commit transactions each 5% of dirty ARC limit, which is 5% of 10% or memory size. I haven't

Re: 14.0-CURRENT boots fine but keyboard does not work

2023-09-04 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 18:43:11 +0200 Matthias Apitz wrote: > I have a 14.0-CURRENT compiled from sources of head from August 4, > which boots fine from a produced USB key, but the keyboard does not > work on an Acer C720 (amd64), on other laptops the keyboard is fine. > > The keyboard works

14.0-CURRENT boots fine but keyboard does not work

2023-09-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
I have a 14.0-CURRENT compiled from sources of head from August 4, which boots fine from a produced USB key, but the keyboard does not work on an Acer C720 (amd64), on other laptops the keyboard is fine. The keyboard works during the boot menu (for example to enable verbose boot messages) but

Re: An attempted test of main's "git: 2ad756a6bbb3" "merge openzfs/zfs@95f71c019" that did not go as planned

2023-09-04 Thread Mark Millard
On Sep 4, 2023, at 06:09, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 04.09.2023 05:56, Mark Millard wrote: >> On Sep 4, 2023, at 02:00, Mark Millard wrote: >>> On Sep 3, 2023, at 23:35, Mark Millard wrote: On Sep 3, 2023, at 22:06, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 03.09.2023 22:54, Mark Millard wrote:

Re: Possible issue with linux xattr support?

2023-09-04 Thread Felix Palmen
* Felix Palmen [20230904 15:39]: > For some reason (I still have to try to get more information about it, > will do soon), something else is broken now. While install from GNU > coreutils works fine, some build systems use 'cp -p' to install files > instead, which now fails wit

Re: Possible issue with linux xattr support?

2023-09-04 Thread Felix Palmen
Hello Dmitry, * Dmitry Chagin [20230830 14:04]: > Thanks, I see, I agree with your change, taken into account. Thanks a lot for committing the fix/workaround as well as the new feature! I just upgraded my test builders to 15-CURRENT to double-check. For some reason (I still have to try to get

Re: An attempted test of main's "git: 2ad756a6bbb3" "merge openzfs/zfs@95f71c019" that did not go as planned

2023-09-04 Thread Alexander Motin
On 04.09.2023 05:56, Mark Millard wrote: On Sep 4, 2023, at 02:00, Mark Millard wrote: On Sep 3, 2023, at 23:35, Mark Millard wrote: On Sep 3, 2023, at 22:06, Alexander Motin wrote: On 03.09.2023 22:54, Mark Millard wrote: After that ^t produced the likes of: load: 6.39 cmd: sh 4849

Re: Speed improvements in ZFS

2023-09-04 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On 9/4/23, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Am 2023-08-28 22:33, schrieb Alexander Leidinger: >> Am 2023-08-22 18:59, schrieb Mateusz Guzik: >>> On 8/22/23, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Am 2023-08-21 10:53, schrieb Konstantin Belousov: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 08:19:28AM +0200, Alexander

Re: An attempted test of main's "git: 2ad756a6bbb3" "merge openzfs/zfs@95f71c019" that did not go as planned

2023-09-04 Thread Mark Millard
On Sep 4, 2023, at 02:00, Mark Millard wrote: > On Sep 3, 2023, at 23:35, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On Sep 3, 2023, at 22:06, Alexander Motin wrote: >> >>> >>> On 03.09.2023 22:54, Mark Millard wrote: After that ^t produced the likes of: load: 6.39 cmd: sh 4849

Re: An attempted test of main's "git: 2ad756a6bbb3" "merge openzfs/zfs@95f71c019" that did not go as planned

2023-09-04 Thread Mark Millard
On Sep 3, 2023, at 23:35, Mark Millard wrote: > On Sep 3, 2023, at 22:06, Alexander Motin wrote: > >> >> On 03.09.2023 22:54, Mark Millard wrote: >>> After that ^t produced the likes of: >>> load: 6.39 cmd: sh 4849 [tx->tx_quiesce_done_cv] 10047.33r 0.51u 121.32s >>> 1% 13004k >> >> So the

Re: An attempted test of main's "git: 2ad756a6bbb3" "merge openzfs/zfs@95f71c019" that did not go as planned

2023-09-04 Thread Mark Millard
On Sep 3, 2023, at 19:54, Mark Millard wrote: > ThreadRipper 1950X (32 hardware threads) doing bulk -J128 > with USE_TMPFS=no , no ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS , no > ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES , USB3 NVMe SSD storage/ZFS-boot-media, > debug system build in use : > > [00:03:44] Building 34214 packages using

Re: An attempted test of main's "git: 2ad756a6bbb3" "merge openzfs/zfs@95f71c019" that did not go as planned

2023-09-04 Thread Mark Millard
On Sep 3, 2023, at 22:06, Alexander Motin wrote: > > On 03.09.2023 22:54, Mark Millard wrote: >> After that ^t produced the likes of: >> load: 6.39 cmd: sh 4849 [tx->tx_quiesce_done_cv] 10047.33r 0.51u 121.32s 1% >> 13004k > > So the full state is not "tx->tx", but is actually a >

Re: Speed improvements in ZFS

2023-09-04 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Am 2023-08-28 22:33, schrieb Alexander Leidinger: Am 2023-08-22 18:59, schrieb Mateusz Guzik: On 8/22/23, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Am 2023-08-21 10:53, schrieb Konstantin Belousov: On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 08:19:28AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Am 2023-08-20 23:17, schrieb Konstantin