Re: Reason why "nocache" option is not displayed in "mount"?

Kirk McKusick wrote on Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:53:05 UTC : > The issue has to do with how flags are defined in mount.h. > Specifically there are the flags that are externally visible > (prefixed with MNT_) and those that are for internal use > (prefixed with MNTK_, the K standing for KERNEL).

Re: Reason why "nocache" option is not displayed in "mount"?

The issue has to do with how flags are defined in mount.h. Specifically there are the flags that are externally visible (prefixed with MNT_) and those that are for internal use (prefixed with MNTK_, the K standing for KERNEL). If it is desirable to have MNTK_NULL_NOCACHE visible, then it should be

RFC: should a va_bytes option be added to vn_getsize_locked()?

Hi, I would like to compare va_size to va_bytes in vn_generic_copy_file_range(), as a heuristic to check for a sparse file (only works for non-compressed file systems). The call to VOP_GETATTR(invp, ..) was replaced by vn_getsize_locked() in vn_generic_copy_file_range(). To get va_bytes I can

Re: Boot failure, amd64 (HP EliteBook 650 G10)

Hi Graham, On 3/9/24 10:52, Graham Perrin wrote: amd64. AFAICT the EliteBook 650 G10 was introduced around May 2023. Does anything in the three photographs tally with a report in Bugzilla? Any overlap with

Re: Reason why "nocache" option is not displayed in "mount"?

Am 2024-03-09 15:27, schrieb Rick Macklem: On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 5:08 AM Alexander Leidinger wrote: Am 2024-03-09 06:07, schrieb Warner Losh: > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:05 PM Jamie Landeg-Jones > wrote: > >> Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> what is the reason why "nocache" is

Re: Boot failure, amd64 (HP EliteBook 650 G10)

I'd love to borrow one of these machines fir a week or so. Warner On Sat, Mar 9, 2024, 2:52 AM Graham Perrin wrote: > > > amd64. > > AFAICT the EliteBook 650 G10 was introduced around May 2023. > > Does anything in the three photographs

Re: Reason why "nocache" option is not displayed in "mount"?

On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 5:08 AM Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Am 2024-03-09 06:07, schrieb Warner Losh: > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:05 PM Jamie Landeg-Jones > > wrote: > > > >> Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> what is the reason why "nocache" is not displayed in the

Re: Reason why "nocache" option is not displayed in "mount"?

Am 2024-03-09 06:07, schrieb Warner Losh: On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:05 PM Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, what is the reason why "nocache" is not displayed in the output of "mount" for nullfs options? Good catch. I also notice that "hidden" is not shown either.

Boot failure, amd64 (HP EliteBook 650 G10)

amd64. AFAICT the EliteBook 650 G10 was introduced around May 2023. Does anything in the three photographs tally with a report in Bugzilla? Any overlap with