but needs some more people
involved.
--
Chris Brennan
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/ | http://xkcd.com/549/
GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8 9E4A EECD
questions.
--
Chris Brennan
--
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/ | http://xkcd.com/549/
GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8 9E4A EECD 9A84 D5B2 0C0C
wouldn't choose either of these, but that's just a
preference, I like neither of them as a project. FreeBSD, Debian or
Gentoo would be my choices.
--
Chris Brennan
--
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
http
. If such a README is to
be implemented, I could find myself writing some correct descriptions
... perhaps a pr is in order?
--
Chris Brennan
--
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com
On 8/31/2011 8:07 AM, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
Am Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:34:54 -0400
schrieb Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net:
the object is to show people *WHY* FreeBSD is a sound (and valid)
choice against the competition, we can't just claim we're better
because we know we are, we have
)
to other contemporary OSes.
It should be noted on the FreeBSD side of the comparison, whom has
borrowed concepts from FreeBSD, such as the network stack or Gentoo's
Portage system (just to name a few that come to mind.)
--
Chris Brennan
--
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses
* FreeBSD is a sound (and valid) choice
against the competition, we can't just claim we're better because we
know we are, we have to provide a convincing argument that is true and
honest fact.
--
Chris Brennan
--
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation
On 8/30/2011 12:21 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 08/30/2011 06:34 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
But this comparison can't be trivial, it has to be genuine, authentic,
(peer reviewed across the board if possible), backed up by fact (links
back to other reputable sources). In short, it's
definition is not meant to provide any form of clearly
defined values to any one OS but to illustrate hypothetical examples.
[2] I repeatedly defined this discussion as project because I couldn't
think of a different term to use that would aptly and/or correctly
describe this discussion.
--
Chris Brennan
didn't make it to the list, can you upload it and
provide us with a link to it instead?
--
Chris Brennan
--
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/ | http://xkcd.com
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.ukwrote:
but still can't connect to the gateway:
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host
ping: sendto: No route to host
ping: sendto: No route to host
^C
--- 192.168.1.1 ping
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 12/01/2011 16:23, Erik wrote:
On one of my first linux desktops, I had a screensaver which displayed
rotated dumpscreens of all kinds of different Operation systems. Apple,
Basic, linux and BSOD..
Did you try http://www.freebsdwiki.net/index.php/High_Resolution_Console?
-- Sent from my Droid
On Jan 9, 2011 6:58 AM, Marc UBM Bocklet ubm.free...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hiho! :-)
Yesterday I upgraded to
FreeBSD hostname 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #28: Sat Jan 8
17:05:30 CET 2011
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Marc UBM Bocklet ubm.free...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 11:45:52 -0500
Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
Did you try
http://www.freebsdwiki.net/index.php/High_Resolution_Console?
Yeah, those are the kernel settings that I've been
14 matches
Mail list logo
