Re: top -n -o res shows empty output

2018-07-18 Thread Daichi GOTO
d.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Daichi GOTO CEO | ONGS Inc. 81-42-316-7945 | dai...@ongs.co.jp | http://www.ongs.co.jp LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/daichigoto

Mellanox Technologies : ConnectX-3 VPI

2012-08-27 Thread Daichi GOTO
I am wondering if FreeBSD 10-CURRNET could use Mellanox Technologies's ConnectX-3 VPI infiniband devices. Is there anyone who are using ConnectX-3 VPI with FreeBSD? -- Daichi GOTO (daichi) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve

Re: DTrace on FreeBSD

2012-04-10 Thread Daichi GOTO
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:14:07 +0100 Sevan / Venture37 ventur...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/04/2012 02:45, Daichi GOTO wrote: Hi, From the DTrace tutorial at AsiaBSDCon 2012, it is a CDDL license issue. Hi Daichi, I wonder which clause/aspect of the license is a problem? I do not know

Re: DTrace on FreeBSD

2012-04-09 Thread Daichi GOTO
/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Daichi GOTO (daichi) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: (unionfs) panic: excl-share with r230341 and above

2012-04-09 Thread Daichi GOTO
-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Daichi GOTO (daichi) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe

Re: (unionfs) panic: excl-share with r230341 and above

2012-04-08 Thread Daichi GOTO
___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Daichi GOTO (daichi) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve diff -urBN /usr/src.orig/sys/fs/unionfs

[Call for Test] unionfs intermediate umount feature

2011-05-10 Thread Daichi GOTO
Hi unionfs users ;) We have developed new unionfs feature, intermediate umount. You can do like this: # mount_unionfs /test2 /test1 # mount_unionfs /test3 /test1 # df above:/test2 x x x xx% /test1 above:/test3 x x x xx% /test1 # umount 'above:/test2' #

RFC: unionfs multiple mounts, cross mounts and recursive mounts limits and manegement feature

2011-04-21 Thread Daichi GOTO
considering to get merged into current if there are no issues and problems. -- Daichi GOTO ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr

Re: RFC: unionfs multiple mounts, cross mounts and recursive mounts limits and manegement feature

2011-04-21 Thread Daichi GOTO
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:03:30 +0400 Alex Zimnitsky aa...@yandex.ru wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:49 +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: It is adjustable with sysctl value 'vfs.unionfs.recursive_limit' as multiple mounts limits. The default value is 1 and it means two-layered ok. Max value

Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464

2010-10-11 Thread Daichi GOTO
Sent from my iPad On Oct 11, 2010, at 5:50 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:39:26 am Daichi GOTO wrote: Next step discussion engaged from this research I guess. Should we do change FreeBSD's fcntl(2) to return correct l_pid when called with F_SETLK

Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464

2010-10-07 Thread Daichi GOTO
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Daichi GOTO dai...@ongs.co.jp wrote: On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:23:02 -0700 Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: 2010/10/4 Daichi GOTO dai...@ongs.co.jp: Thanks nice test tool :) And at last I got it excepting

Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464

2010-10-07 Thread Daichi GOTO
On Oct 5, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Daichi GOTO dai...@ongs.co.jp wrote: On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:23:02

Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464

2010-10-05 Thread Daichi GOTO
% And working scene: Windows 2: % chmod u+w /tmp/lockfile % ls -l /tmp/lockfile -rwsr-x--- 1 daichi wheel 0 10月 5 15:22 /tmp/lockfile % ./test_fcntl My pid: 43646 test_fcntl: fcntl[1]: Resource temporarily unavailable PID=43490 has the lock % -- Daichi GOTO CEO | ONGS Inc. 81-42-316-7945

Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464

2010-10-05 Thread Daichi GOTO
a successful F_GETLK request, the value of l_whence is SEEK_SET. Thus, after fixing the test app I'm getting a sensical value: -- Daichi GOTO 81-42-316-7945 | dai...@ongs.co.jp | http://www.ongs.co.jp LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/daichigoto

Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464

2010-10-05 Thread Daichi GOTO
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:23:02 -0700 Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: 2010/10/4 Daichi GOTO dai...@ongs.co.jp: Thanks nice test tool :)  And at last I got it excepting one mystery! On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:17:08 -0700 Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: Following through

Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464

2010-10-04 Thread Daichi GOTO
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:05:12 -0700 Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Daichi GOTO dai...@ongs.co.jp wrote: It looks very strange. fcntl() always fails to delete lock file and command.l_pid is always -6464. This issue is disclosed in porting Google's

Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464

2010-10-04 Thread Daichi GOTO
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 07:19:45 -0700 Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: issues that might be occurring with the software, as per my copy of SUSv4 (see the ERRORS section of fcntl). I would print out the strerror for that case.     Providing a backtrace of the application's execution

fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464

2010-10-03 Thread Daichi GOTO
-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #6 r213257: Thu Sep 30 10:30:06 JST 2010 r...@parancell.ongs.co.jp:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PARANCELL amd64 % My home directory on NFS server. Does anyone have any ideas? -- Daichi GOTO CEO | ONGS Inc. 81-42-316-7945 | dai...@ongs.co.jp | http://www.ongs.co.jp

unionfs a little improvement

2010-08-18 Thread Daichi GOTO
is simple and effective I guess. If you unionfs guys or fs guys have some ideas around this patch, please teach me. After some tests and a couple of weeks after, I'll commit ed's patch if there is no objections. -- Daichi GOTO 81-42-316-7945 | dai...@ongs.co.jp | http://www.ongs.co.jp LinkedIn: http

unionfs a little improvement

2010-08-18 Thread Daichi GOTO
is simple and effective I guess. If you unionfs guys or fs guys have some ideas around this patch, please teach me. After some tests and a couple of weeks after, I'll commit ed's patch if there is no objections. -- Daichi GOTO CEO | ONGS Inc. 81-42-316-7945 | dai...@ongs.co.jp | http://www.ongs.co.jp