On 03/02/15 11:55, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/2/15 5:27 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 3/2/15 4:14 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/1/15 10:49 AM, Harrison Grundy wrote:
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package
On 03/02/15 01:23, David Chisnall wrote:
On 1 Mar 2015, at 21:29, Rui Paulo rpa...@me.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 2015, at 11:11, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org
wrote:
How would it be in a port? It involves modifying core
utilities (some of which, like ifconfig, rely on kernel APIs
that
On 03/01/15 13:25, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Harrison Grundy
harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com wrote:
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package
, since processing XML in base
On 03/01/15 05:33, Sulev-Madis Silber (ketas) wrote:
Hello.
First, I would be happy to have JSON and XML output about
filesystems, users, routes... but I don't like how it makes code of
df, w, netstat hard to read/maintain and often broken.
I don't think it would be good to continue
it. I'm
trying to understand the use case for this.)
--- Harrison
On 03/01/15 10:31, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Harrison Grundy
harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com wrote:
If someone could summarize what this is, I'd greatly appreciate it.
https
On 03/01/15 11:11, David Chisnall wrote:
On 1 Mar 2015, at 18:49, Harrison Grundy
harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com wrote:
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning
behind putting into base, over a port or package, since
processing XML in base is a pain, and it can't serve
