Hi Mark,
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 03:39:42PM -0800, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote:
> After using poudriere to build ports for native cortex-a72
> on the MACCHIATObin Double Shot (and similarly for
> cortex-a57 on the OverDrive 1000) I attempted to do my
> usual bulk build targeting cortex-a7
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:13:07AM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
> On 02/16/18 10:05, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> > On 16.02.2018 17:44, Michael Butler wrote:
> >>> do you have some specific optimization flags in make.conf?
> >>> Can you show the output of `head -40
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 02:20:16PM +0100, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 09:06:51PM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote:
Does anyone know if it is only curthread that needs to be atomic? If so
this
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:26:14PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, February 25, 2013 7:47:47 am Olivier Houchard wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 07:09:20PM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:43:49 -0500
John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday
then loads curthread from this address.
One solution I discussed with Olivier Houchard is to keep the data in
the coprocessor but to then load it into a dedicated register when we
enter the kernel.
Reading curthread would then be a single load instruction thanks to
ARM's ldr using
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:46:36PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:05:11AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:43:20 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:04:50PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
I wonder why the waiting_threads stuff is needed at all. The cv could
be woken up unconditionally everytime. What is the reason for the cv_wait
call in cdevpriv data destructor ? You cannot have a thread doing e.g.
read
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:22:36AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Trying to cross build ARM fails in the following way on 8-stable:
8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 29 13:09:23 UTC 2011
make toolchain TARGET=arm
Is this perhaps also an issue in 9-current?
Any clues?
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 02:01:38AM +0300, Yuri Pankov wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the following panic trying to boot March 5 snapshot on
HP Pavilion DV8 notebook (8.2-RELEASE GENERIC kernel seems to boot on
the same hardware just fine):
run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60
Strange:
Not so much, the first values for ras_start/end were chosen to be immediate
values, so you could just mov them, but the new one aren't.
Try something like the patch attached instead (untested, I have no arm setup
here, but you'll get the idea).
Regards,
Olivier
Index:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 04:36:28PM +0200, Maxime Henrion wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 02:28:33AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
+ If you have the kernel.debug for this kernel, could you send the gdb -k
+ output of:
+
+ l *in6_pcbbind+0x2a7
I've looked at
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 11:13:23PM +0100, ?yvind Rakv?g wrote:
I believe the commit Feb 20 17:31:11 2003 UTC on
src/sys/dev/sound/pci/emu10k1.c broke something.
With a kernel built from 17:00 sources sound works, from 19:00 there is
only the sound of silence. Everything looks OK, xmms,
busy issue is fixed by Brian Feldman's recent commit.
You can find the patch here :
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~cognet/dsp.c.diff
Cheers,
Olivier Houchard
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
and the driver works...
all's well that ends well?
hopefully the Tekram DC395U/W will be officially
committed
Hi,
Could you please try this one: http://www.ci0.org/trm/trm.tar.gz ?
It should fix your problem.
Cheers,
Olivier Houchard
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
.org/trm (I don't really remember what the diff
are, certainly mainly style changes).
Cheers.
Olivier Houchard
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:41:32PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 02:19:40PM +, Simon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any hints? Seems like some environment configuration problem or
latent bug somewhere..
I just rebuild my current today and gvim has started
16 matches
Mail list logo
