Re: nvme controller reset failures on recent -CURRENT

2024-02-13 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 13.02.2024 um 20:56 schrieb Pete Wright : > 1. M.2 nvme really does need proper cooling, much more so than traditional > SATA/SAS/SCSI drives. I recently found a tool named "Scrutiny" that presents a nice dashboard of all your disk devices and their SMART data including crucial

Re: Removing fdisk and bsdlabel (legacy partition tools)

2024-01-24 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 25.01.2024 um 00:47 schrieb Rodney W. Grimes > : > >> I would agree personally, to moving to ports (eg ports/sysutils) with >> a DEPRECATED in the DESCR or something, or better yet a Make >> invokation event to say "superceded, here is how to proceed against >> advice") or

Re: noatime on ufs2

2024-01-14 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi folks, that's a really interesting polite and constructive discussion going on here, and a trip down history lane to boot :-) I just want to add one thing to Warner's last argument: > Am 14.01.2024 um 18:58 schrieb Warner Losh : > Though in all honesty, I've never been able to measure a

Re: bridge(4) and IPv6 broken?

2024-01-02 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 02.01.2024 um 13:56 schrieb Jan Bramkamp : > > IPv6 enabled interfaces need a link-local address for normal operation. > Please set the auto-linklocal flag on the bridge and try again. And remove the link-local address from alc0. A bridge member must not have any layer 3 addresses

Re: Using etcupdate resolve, was Re: Surprise null root password

2023-06-15 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 15.06.2023 um 19:26 schrieb bob prohaska : > The puzzle at this point is what to do. It's looks like the > points of interest are the lines marked "yours" and "new", > but I'll admit to bafflement which to modify and whether > the modifications needed include the and >

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

2022-11-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 09.11.2022 um 22:59 schrieb Alexander Leidinger : > Quoting "Patrick M. Hausen" (from Wed, 9 Nov 2022 22:47:28 > +0100): >> >> I apologize, should have included that in the last mail. >> This is a current FreeBSD 13.1-p2 hosting system we run. >

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

2022-11-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 09.11.2022 um 22:38 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen : >> Am 09.11.2022 um 22:26 schrieb Alexander Leidinger : >> On quick look I haven't found a place where a compatibility setting is used >> for the rpool during the creation, so I can't point out what the exact >&

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

2022-11-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 09.11.2022 um 22:26 schrieb Alexander Leidinger : > On quick look I haven't found a place where a compatibility setting is used > for the rpool during the creation, so I can't point out what the exact > difference is. > Given that empty_bpobj is not in the list of the boot code, it

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

2022-11-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 09.11.2022 um 22:05 schrieb Alexander Leidinger : > Attention, "upgrade" is overloaded here. "OS upgrade" will not render the > pool unbootable (modulo bugs), but "zpool upgrade rpool" will (except we have > provisions that zpool upgrade doesn't enable all features in case the bootfs

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

2022-11-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 09.11.2022 um 21:56 schrieb Warner Losh > > If all you do is upgrade, then no, modulo bugs that we've thankfully not had > yet. It's when you enable something on the zpool that you can run into > trouble, but that's true independent of upgrade :) Thanks. That lets me sleep way

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

2022-11-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi Warner, > Am 09.11.2022 um 21:51 schrieb Warner Losh : > Yes. For safety, boot loader upgrade is mandatory when you do a zpool upgrade > of the root filesystem. > It was definitely needed in the OpenZFS jump, and we've had one or two other > flag days since. That's a given and not a

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

2022-11-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 09.11.2022 um 21:31 schrieb Alexander Leidinger : > Some features are used directly when enabled. Some features go back to the > enabled state when some conditions are met. Some features are not reversible > without re-creating the pool (e.g. device_removal). The zzpool-features >

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

2022-11-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 09.11.2022 um 21:15 schrieb Alexander Leidinger : > Quoting "Patrick M. Hausen" (from Wed, 9 Nov 2022 21:02:52 > +0100): >> Yet, I made it a habit to whenever I see this message: >> >> --- >> status: Some supported feature

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

2022-11-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 09.11.2022 um 20:45 schrieb Alexander Leidinger : > But "zpool set feature@edonr=enabled rpool" (or any other feature not in the > list we talk about) would render it unbootable. Sorry, just to be sure. So an active change of e.g. checksum or compression algorithm might render the

Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

2022-11-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 09.11.2022 um 16:54 schrieb Warner Losh : > >>There is a fixed list of features we support in the boot loader: > >>[...] > >>Any feature not on this list will cause the boot loader to > >> reject the pool. I admit that I do not grasp the full implications of this

Re: Beadm can't create snapshot

2022-08-22 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 22.08.2022 um 10:45 schrieb Peter Jeremy : > > On 2022-Aug-17 18:07:20 +0200, "Patrick M. Hausen" wrote: >> Isn't beadm retired in favour of bectl? > > bectl still has a number of bugs: > 1) The output from "bectl list" is in filesystem/bena

Re: Beadm can't create snapshot

2022-08-17 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 17.08.2022 um 18:05 schrieb Ryan Moeller : > > > On 8/17/22 10:35 AM, Thomas Laus wrote: >> I attempted to create a ZFS snapshot after upgrading this morning and >> received this error >> >> # beadm create n257443 >> cannot create 'zroot/ROOT/n257443': 'snapshots_changed' is

Re: Updating EFI boot loader results in boot hangup

2022-08-17 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 17.08.2022 um 13:48 schrieb Idwer Vollering : > > $ sudo camcontrol devlist > at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0) > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,ada1) > > $ gpart show ada0 ada1 > =>40 1953525088 ada0 GPT (932G) > 401024 1

Re: Windows Subsystem for FreeBSD?

2022-08-17 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 17.08.2022 um 15:48 schrieb Nuno Teixeira : > Today I found a new thing that might be interesting: > Windows Subsystem for Linux or WSL (url here) > > I've didn't tried it yet but it makes me think if there are some advantages > if WS were available to FreeBSD. You understood this

Re: Cross-compile worked, cross-install not so much ...

2022-05-01 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 26.04.2022 um 17:47 schrieb bob prohaska : > If the result is unsatisfactory, self-hosting isn't impossible. I've been > doing it for a few years now, albeit with much help from the list. On a > Pi3 running aarch64 memory and swap are a constraint. I'd suggest 4 GB > of swap and -j2

Re: Cross-compile worked, cross-install not so much ...

2022-04-26 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, I just threw a bit of hardware at the problem for now. In addition to the seven-node TuringPi that I would like to run with FreeBSD after I cannot make Raspbian run stable even when completely idle I have another actively cooled single CM3+ system (the "pi8" you saw in my first post) So

Re: Cross-compile worked, cross-install not so much ...

2022-04-26 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 25.04.2022 um 21:54 schrieb Warner Losh : > Cross installing is supported. Native installing of a cross build world isn't. > > When I've had to do this in the past, I've just mounted the embedded system > on my > beefy server under /mumble (allowing root on the embedded system for

Re: Cross-compile worked, cross-install not so much ...

2022-04-25 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, > Am 25.04.2022 um 21:18 schrieb Brooks Davis : > Cross install is not supported. As you have seen, certain tools are > bootstrapped on the build host and used during the install process. You > might be able to get away with nuking > /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/tmp/legacy (or maybe tmp)

Cross-compile worked, cross-install not so much ...

2022-04-25 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, getting into FreeBSD ARM64 I tried to compile a current system on a fast AMD64 VM and now I am somewhat stuck - no help using search engines and the like. 1st step: # checkout main aka 14-CURRENT cd /usr/src make -j 8 TARGET=arm64 TARGET_ARCH=aarch64 buildworld

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, all, Am 28.10.2013 um 17:49 schrieb dro...@rpi.edu: I notice that CAP was removed from the ports collection some time ago, and that there didn't seem to be any objections to that. So that's some more indication that appletalk isn't seeing much use. I’d guess the main reason is that Apple

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-18 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, all, Am 15.12.2011 um 12:18 schrieb Michael Ross: Following Steven Hartlands' suggestion, from one of my machines: /usr/ports/sysutils/dmidecode/#sysctl -a | egrep hw.vendor|hw.product /usr/ports/sysutils/dmidecode/#dmidecode -t 2 # dmidecode 2.11 SMBIOS 2.6 present. Handle

C shell scripts (was: Re: which(1), rewritten in C?)

2000-03-03 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Services Systemhaus GmbH Scheffelstr. 17a76135 Karlsruhe phone +49 721 9109 0 fax +49 721 9109 100 http://www.punkt.de/ Patrick M. Hausen Technical Director email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i

FTP_INTERNAL_LS

2000-02-12 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
and /etc/group for reading before chrooting? Regards, Patrick -- WEB Internet Services Systemhaus GmbH Scheffelstr. 17a76135 Karlsruhe phone +49 721 9109 0 fax +49 721 9109 100 http://www.punkt.de/ Patrick M. Hausen Technical Director email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe

Re: problems with openssl in 4.0rc and ports/security/openssh

2000-02-11 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi Mark! I installed a fresh 4.0 release candidate this morning, including the crypto stuff (des, kerberos...). Tried to install openssh from ports tree as well, but couldn't. It was looking for /usr/include/openssl/rsa.h which was not there, and I couldn't find a knob to turn RSA

XFree86 Libraries

2000-02-10 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Karlsruhe phone +49 721 9109 0 fax +49 721 9109 100 http://www.punkt.de/ Patrick M. Hausen Technical Director email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: make buildworld works... make installworld fails!

2000-02-07 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi! This happened to me on the last 3 'current' days: === lib/libcrypt install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 libscrypt.a /usr/lib install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 libscrypt_p.a /usr/lib install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 -fschg libscrypt.so.2 /usr/lib /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:

Re: Snapshots?

2000-02-07 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all! Charon wrote: At 02:40 PM 2/7/00 -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote: Why have there not been any snapshots of 4.0-CURRENT since 01/27/2000? (current.freebsd.org). Just curious... I've been trying to get a recent snapshot for a while too... There haven't been any since 2127 on

Re: /usr/src/Makefile.inc1: make update

2000-02-07 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all! Bill Fumerola wrote: On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 10:31:17PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Why does "make update" in /usr/src also include a cvsup of /usr/ports? Since /usr/ports and /usr/docs have Makefiles and "update" targets of their own, and the alternative update by