Re: GCC update for testing

2012-05-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 05/18/12 02:08, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: On (17/05/2012 10:44), Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi; I took a bunch of patches that were merged into the GCC 4.1 branch (under GPLv2) and prepared a patch for merging them into our base gcc. These are supposed to be bug fixes only. You can get the patch here

Re: GCC update for testing

2012-05-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi again; On 05/17/12 11:44, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-05-17 17:44, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi; I took a bunch of patches that were merged into the GCC 4.1 branch (under GPLv2) and prepared a patch for merging them into our base gcc. These are supposed to be bug fixes only. You can get

GCC update for testing

2012-05-17 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; I took a bunch of patches that were merged into the GCC 4.1 branch (under GPLv2) and prepared a patch for merging them into our base gcc. These are supposed to be bug fixes only. You can get the patch here: http://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/patches/patch-contrib-gcc And, for those really

Re: GCC update for testing

2012-05-17 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Dimitry; On 05/17/12 11:44, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-05-17 17:44, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi; I took a bunch of patches that were merged into the GCC 4.1 branch (under GPLv2) and prepared a patch for merging them into our base gcc. These are supposed to be bug fixes only. You can get

Re: panic, seems related to r234386

2012-05-16 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; On 05/12/12 17:49, Mateusz Guzik wrote: Gave this a spin and found what looks like a deadlock: http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/ext2fs.txt Not a new problem, it would seem. Same issue with 8.3-PRERELEASE r232656M. pid 2680 (fts) holds lock for vnode cb4be414 and tries to

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Oleg and Gabor; Awesome! Kudos and huge thanks for working on this!! Pedro. On 05/08/12 10:51, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: Hi Folks, Oleg Moskalenko has been working very hard on BSD sort and by now we think it is compatible with the base version (and has even more features, the ideas mostly

Re: jemalloc: jemalloc_arena.c:182: Failed assertion: p[i] == 0

2012-04-30 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 04/30/12 14:04, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote: On 29/04/2012 12:04 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: .. and the output from the buildworld: .. skipped .. -DSOFTFLOAT_FOR_GCC -DYP -DNS_CACHING -DSYMBOL_VERSIONING -std=gnu99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized

Re: contrib/jemalloc

2012-04-21 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 04/21/12 02:23, Doug Barton wrote: ... In libedit we have incomplete merges from upstream (that was CVS fault), we have some changes that are obsolete wrt to how upstream solved the same issues and we have a couple of files that have diverged completely from upstream. I agree that sounds

Re: contrib/jemalloc

2012-04-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; --- Ven 20/4/12, Doug Barton ha scritto: ... The workflow I'm using is documented in the patch (contrib/jemalloc/FREEBSD-upgrade).  Can you tell me how to achieve a similarly streamlined import flow with a vendor branch in the mix?  Also, what history would a vendor branch preserve

Re: contrib/jemalloc

2012-04-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- Ven 20/4/12, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org ha scritto: ... With due respect, if doing it the right way is too difficult, the answer is to ask for help rather than giving up. There are plenty of us who are experienced with doing this, and would be glad to assist. In the CVS era I

Re: contrib/jemalloc

2012-04-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 04/20/12 19:32, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:13:32PM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Easier said than done. Feel free to give libedit a try. That has nothing to do with our process and everything to do with us blindly hacking away pissing all over to be our own thing

[CFT]: libedit update (NetBSD CVS 2009-12-28)

2012-04-09 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; I noticed that libedit is seriously outdated so I tried to sync it with the upstream (NetBSD) tree. For the time being I avoided the international support and related changes since they move some files and, in general, complicates getting things merged properly. The resulting patch is

Re: -ffast-math in Ports and wrong generated code

2012-04-05 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 04/05/12 01:46, Andrey Simonenko wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:45:25AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 04/04/12 04:29, Andrey Simonenko wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 06:43:00AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: The SVN commit http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=228756

Re: -ffast-math in Ports and wrong generated code

2012-04-04 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 04/04/12 04:29, Andrey Simonenko wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 06:43:00AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:21:11PM +0300, Andrey Simonenko wrote: I use one port from the Ports Collection, that works with FP. Having reinstalled it (its version was not changed) I noticed

[CFT] ext2/3 nanosecond timestamps patch.

2012-02-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; I have been working on implementing some ext4 features that can work in ext3 mode in preparation towards bringing some more of the ext4 work Zheng Liu did for his GSoC 2010 project. The first of this features is nanosecond/birthtime timestamping, which basically means that if the

[CFT] New headers from the maestro3 snd driver

2012-01-13 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello guys; As some of you may have noticed I have been replacing some GPL'd headers from the sound system. In the case of the Maestro3 snd driver, basically the same headers are available in the BSD licensed OSS drivers (in the Attic though - that card is rather old). If someone still has that

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-29 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- Gio 29/12/11, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org ha scritto: ... I'd appreciate any specific comments you might have, and especially specific suggestions for improvements. Except from people who are old hands at sysinstall, I've received almost universally positive comments

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-29 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- Gio 29/12/11, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org ha scritto: FWIW; I have practically given up on installing FreeBSD lately and I mostly use PC-BSD. I mainly see two big issues: -X.Org has become very difficult to install. Setting up hald and friends, not to mention that you have

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-29 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; --- Gio 29/12/11, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org ha scritto: I use the nvidia driver, no idea what people with ATI cards do. I'm sorry to hear you're having trouble with that, if you ever want to try again and you can't work it out get me off list ;) Getting X11 to run on

<    1   2