Re: freebsd-update 12.3 to 14.0RC1 takes 12-24 hours (block cloning regression)

2023-10-18 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2023-10-17 09:40:37, Kevin Bowling wrote: The flash SLOG system took around 12 hours to complete freebsd-update from 13.2 to 14.0-RC1. The system without the SLOG took nearly 24 hours. This was the result of ~50k patches, and ~10k files from freebsd-update and a very pathological 'install'

Re: changes to ps -d?

2023-09-19 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2023-09-19 15:22:49, Ronald Klop wrote: Curious about the meaning of "would be the best in that -d would go back to what it was" in https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004277.html. Currently in "ps -d -p " -d is not back at what it was. I meant that it's back to

Re: ps(1) bugs and problems

2023-08-22 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2023-08-15 13:28:07, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: The old -d and the new -D'$^' would be the best in that -d would go back to what it was and -D would provide the much needed feature in two variants (possibly more in the future, if needed) while only taking one option-letter. The only problem is

Re: ps(1) bugs and problems

2023-08-14 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2023-08-11 12:32:02, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: How about reverting '-d', and adding "-D" for descending, and "-A" for ascending? I don't like that, because it would take three option-letters in total to implement the same function in different variants. The old -d and the new -D'$^' would

Re: ps(1) bugs and problems

2023-08-10 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
I thought about this more and the change I proposed in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41231 seems unnecessarily complicated, regardless of which characters will be chosen to denote going up and down the process tree. ps -D'^$' suggests there are possibly more characters to use and maybe even some

Re: ps(1) bugs and problems

2023-07-29 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2023-07-29 00:07:37, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: I have a program that produces a list of PIDS, that are supplied via '-p' to /bin/ps and are sorted with '-d'. What language is it written in? What is the use case? After a late upgrade on a particular machine, I've just been bitten by the

Re: recover deleted file

2022-04-17 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2022-04-17 14:13:07, Peter Jeremy wrote: If the information is very critical (you mentioned legal consequences) then you might like to consider real-time replication of the MySQL redo logs to another systems - though that won't necessarily protect you from someone accidently doing a "DELETE

Re: [HEADSUP] making /bin/sh the default shell for root

2021-10-05 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2021-09-22 11:32:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 05:19:38AM -0400, Daniel Morante via freebsd-current wrote: Will history/completion continue to work the same way? (for example typing part of the command, pressing UP and having it complete based on history) No, this

Re: [HEADSUP] making /bin/sh the default shell for root

2021-09-23 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2021-09-23 09:40:50, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: Those who DO like it changed, have already made changes to have it changed, so changing the default only adds to work for both parties, to me a net loss. Aren't you forgetting about someone?

Re: [HEADSUP] making /bin/sh the default shell for root

2021-09-22 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2021-09-22 10:36:45, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Recently our sh(1) has receive update to make it more user friendly in interactive mode: * command completion (thanks pstef@) * improvement in the emacs mode, to make it behave by default like other shells * improvement in the vi mode (in

Re: FYI: devel/kyua 14 failures for head -r338518M based build in a Pine64+ 2GB (aarch64 / cortexA53 / A64) context

2018-09-16 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2018-09-11 02:44:49, Mark Millard wrote: usr.bin/indent/functional_test:nsac -> failed: atf-check failed; see the output of the test for details [0.151s] usr.bin/indent/functional_test:sac -> failed: atf-check failed; see the output of the test for details [0.150s] Those were

Re: updates to HEAD online, RSS non-browser ??

2018-07-16 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2018-07-14 04:36:05, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: secnetix.de used to let me read HEAD updates to src daily. About several monhts ago, my browsers cannot reach it and the 2ndry site is tedious to read in an equivalent manner. AFAIK the site is still up. Recent EU laws or some other cause?