Re: ipnat memory leak?

2003-10-09 Thread Vector
> > > natd chokes on the latest windoze worms and I have implemented some DoS > > prevention/worm protection in ipnat but I'm seeing this memory leak without > > my improvements there at all. > > > > If it's in the kernel, ipnat is kept under control when natd would normally > > be sucking the

Re: ipnat memory leak?

2003-10-08 Thread Vector
ntrol when natd would normally be sucking the CPU dry and preventing things like remote logins, very slugish updates, etc... and others I don't particularly want to go into at the moment. vec - Original Message - From: "marcos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Vector

Re: ipnat memory leak?

2003-10-08 Thread Vector
ntrol when natd would normally be sucking the CPU dry and preventing things like remote logins, very slugish updates, etc... and others I won't go into at the moment. vec - Original Message - From: "marcos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Vector" <[EMAIL PRO

ipnat memory leak?

2003-10-08 Thread Vector
I was using ipfw and natd but I wanted to move nat into the kernel so I recompiled with ipfilter and ipnat. Now, after terminating natd, and setting up ipnat rules in /etc/ipnat.rules, I see memory increase at a rate of just under 1MB per minutes. Has anyone else seen a memory leak in ipnat or ip

ipintrq

2003-09-18 Thread Vector
What happened to ipintrq? I know it is now defined in ip_input.c...problem is I'm trying to port a driver to 5.1. The files are in a subdirectory in /usr/src/sys/dev and in order to get it to compile, I've declared it like this: extern struct ifqueue ipintrq; But upon linking, I get unresolved s