work and tell me if you have any concerns and
questions.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: usr.bin/netstat/inet.c
===
--- usr.bin/netstat/inet.c (revision 221564)
+++ usr.bin/netstat/inet.c (working copy)
@@ -622,6 +622,7 @@
\t\t%lu
/~weongyo/rfc5682/
The above links include some graphs before and after applying RFC5682
patch and a patch I prepared.
If no objections I'd like to commit it into HEAD and still welcomes your
opinions and reviews.
If you have any concerns and questions please let me know.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
/~weongyo/patch_tcpfrto_20110205.diff
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: netinet/tcp_input.c
===
--- netinet/tcp_input.c (revision 218148)
+++ netinet/tcp_input.c (working copy)
@@ -161,6 +161,11 @@
VNET_NAME(tcp_abc_l_var), 2,
Cap
are printed.
Please give me some hints whether the patch is reasonable. If it's
reasonable, is there other tools which I should make patches?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c
===
--- sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c (revision
which enqueued at last should
be executed at last. It seems that at least it's not a general for
taskqueue(9). In my humble opinion it looks a trick. I think it'd
better to find a general solution to solve it though I used sx(9) lock
in my patches.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:17:39PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, September 10, 2010 4:28:58 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:14:19 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
I have a question
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:14:19 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about IN_MULTI_LOCK() because it uses MTX_DEF flag
when it's initialized so I always encounters the following LOR
lock order
);
IN_MULTI_LOCK();
break;
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Gustau P??rez wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote:
Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to
read
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 05:02:42PM +0200, Gustau P??rez wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote:
Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to
read
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:04:34AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Do you want me to test anything else ?
OK. The patch is ready to test. Could you please test it with attached
patch?
No panic this time. I also don't get
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:41:34PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Do you want me to test anything else ?
OK. The patch is ready to test. Could you please test it with attached
patch?
No panic this time. I also don't get these messages any more:
May 10 23:25
and bufwrite, buffer is
not busy?
I'm running 9.0/AMD64 from 1 of May (don't know exact svn revision).
Do you want me to test anything else ?
OK. The patch is ready to test. Could you please test it with attached
patch?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: if_bwn.c
.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as amd64-marcel-freebsd...
Cannot access memory at address 0xff0127e0
(kgdb) bt
#0 0x in ?? ()
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
(kgdb) q
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
my patch due to kernel panic.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:27:31PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/6 Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Gustau P?rez wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been testing the driver for a few time with AMD64/CURRENT
sorry for belated response that I had no time to
read and work email and wireless stuffs.
Could you please test this symptom with attached patch? It looks in
CURRENT it missed to initialize a ratectl when it associates with AP.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: if_bwn.c
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:33:02AM +0200, Gustau P?rez wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:10:14AM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 00:28:33 -0800
Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com wrote
= 'Broadcom Corporation'
class = network
Should I expect this to work with to work here or try the NDIS driver?
BCM4353 uses N PHY so it's not supported by bwn(4). I think NDIS driver
is only a way to try currently.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
correctly with this device.
If you're a CURRENT user could you please show me the result of `netstat
-ni' after updating latest CURRENT and keeping scanning channels?
In LP-PHY AFAIK there's a DMA Fatal error issue which isn't solved yet.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:43:57AM +0200, Alex RAY wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:55:58 -0800
Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:12:05PM +0200, Alex RAY wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:13:34 -0800
Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com wrote
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:12:05PM +0200, Alex RAY wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:13:34 -0800
Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought that your opinion was right and if mem is
0xf400-0xf4003fff (16 Kb) I thought the device has 4 cores. However
it looks
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 08:36:41AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Saturday 13 March 2010 03:42:46 Rui Paulo wrote:
On 13 Mar 2010, at 09:18, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:50:29AM -0800, PseudoCylon wrote:
Hello,
Finally, I have fixed mysterious device lock
/showthread.php?s=1d3b01fbed80c61ff508e12e9805146et=7562
Out of curiosity, what's the difference between run(4) and rt2870 driver
written by Alexander Egorenkov? And why there are two drivers?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
${.CURDIR}/../../../../../kern
/sys/kern
/usr/src/sys/kern
Could you please check that one of above directories exists?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
==
+ SIBA_TYPE_PCI, (unsupported bustype %d\n,
+ ((struct siba_softc*) device_get_ivars(dev))-sd_bus-siba_type));
It was all getting a bit unwieldy, I committed a more simple fix in
r205003.
Thank you for fix and sorry for break build.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
entirely correct (duplicate evaluation of
device_get_ivars()),
Your patch is committed at r204992. Thank you!
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 12:05:43AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 16:16 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
When it occurs again, I will get you the details and the full dmesg. Do
you want a verbose dmesg, or a standard one?
I think a standard one is enough. Thank you
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
When it occurs again, I will get you the details and the full
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:32:40AM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:52:59 -0800
Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:15:35AM +0200, Alex RAY wrote:
Hi Weongyo,
Can new siba release operate in systems like in this SVG image
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:50:43PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:37 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
I was extremely pleased to see this driver, so I could get off of the
flaky NDIS version. I have
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:46:09PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On 3/3/10 5:04 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:50:43PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:37 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:57:26PM +0100, Gustau P?rez wrote:
En/na John Baldwin ha escrit:
On Monday 01 March 2010 3:22:34 pm Gustau P?rez wrote:
En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:21:06PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
Hi, Weongyo,
On 2010/02
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:56:50PM +, Aditya Sarawgi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:51:34AM -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:18:48AM +, Aditya Sarawgi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:53:31PM -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
Now bwn(4
mode not DMA
mode using the following tunable variable:
hw.bwn.usedma
Its default value is 1 to enable DMA operation so if you set it 0, PIO
mode would be used and could see the message like below:
bwn0: PIO
Could you please test with it?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
so sometimes TX speed could be unstable and fluctuate.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: if_bwn.c
===
--- if_bwn.c (revision 204437)
+++ if_bwn.c (working copy)
@@ -12846,7 +12846,6 @@
static unsigned int
bwn_sqrt(struct bwn_mac *mac
to compile without pci code.
But makes sure that your device doesn't have PCI core.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:21:06PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
Hi, Weongyo,
On 2010/02/25 16:51, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
FYI bwn(4) driver is committed into FreeBSD tree. I think the driver
supports your LP PHY device. After cvsup please try to rebuild siba_bwn
and bwn modules.
Could you
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:18:48AM +, Aditya Sarawgi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:53:31PM -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
Now bwn(4) is available at the public and waiting test and review. The
status of this driver is *alpha* so could make panics, warnings and
errors
41 matches
Mail list logo
