Re: EFI zfs loader and beadm?

. On 10 March 2016 at 19:23, Trond Endrestøl < trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:38+0300, Andrey Fesenko wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:11 PM, krad <kra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As Eric said you cant have /boot on a separ

Re: EFI zfs loader and beadm?

property, symlinks and rootfs variables in the loader.conf. But why would you want to do this? It's more work and non standard, and will break a lot? On 10 March 2016 at 12:11, Andrey Fesenko <f0and...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:55 PM, krad <kra...@gmai

Re: EFI zfs loader and beadm?

presumably it boots now? On 10 March 2016 at 11:01, Andrey Fesenko <f0and...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:49 PM, krad <kra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Make sure you are running the latest snapshot of current or 10.3 as > well, as > > the MFC commits

Re: EFI zfs loader and beadm?

Make sure you are running the latest snapshot of current or 10.3 as well, as the MFC commits were in early February for 10-stable On 9 March 2016 at 16:01, Andrey Fesenko wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > > On 03/09/2016

Re: LSI SAS 3108 RAID Controller

Just a sanity check 1st. Are you going to be using zfs or ufs? If zfs you probably want the reflash the card the the relevant HBA firmware rather the the raid firmware. This will expose the disks nativly which is best for zfs. Sorry if this isn't appropriate for you but I would thought I would

ZFSROOT UEFI boot

Hi, I need to get one of my machines converted over from bios GPT zfsroot boot to efi. I know you can boot freebsd under EFI with a ufs kernel but this isnt the route i want. There are patches under test for EFI zfs root. However when I read the thread it was unclear which version of these patches

Freebsd 11 usb image zfs on root install on DN2820FYKH

Has anyone got freebsd booting on an intel NUC DN2820FYKH? It installs fine just wont boot (doesnt see boot loader). I'm doing legacy not efi mode. I'm starting to bang my head against the wall on this one. Time to leave it for a bit i think ___

Re: Freebsd 11 usb image zfs on root install on DN2820FYKH

hmm, got it working by downgrading to v32 firmware. It seems the is a bug in intels wonderful uefi code, which of course the blame freebsd for 8/ On 18 September 2014 13:05, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone got freebsd booting on an intel NUC DN2820FYKH? It installs fine just wont

Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?

I always found natting in ipfw rather awkward and harder than in pf. Looking at the man page it doesnt seem to have changed. I should probably give it another go though as it has been about 10 years now On 31 July 2014 14:41, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at

Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?

in this thread. It would be awesome if it ended up as a supported linux thing as well, so the world could be rid of iptables. However i guess thats just an unrealistic dream On 19 July 2014 09:32, Stephen Hurd sh...@sasktel.net wrote: krad wrote: that is true and I have not problem using man

Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?

I would like to see an updated version of pf. I realize its a big job to port it though On 17 July 2014 00:12, Kristian K. Nielsen free...@com.jkkn.dk wrote: Hi all, I have been encouraged by people on the pf-mailinglist to move this discussion to the current mailinglist since this may be

Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?

this is also another important point. If you go onto google and search on how to do this and that under pf, you get a mix of freebsd, and openbsd stuff coming up. I havent analysed it but i think the majority of the stuff is openbsd related. THerefore I find some nice solution to my problem, only

Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?

: Back in the day we didn't have Google to ask the oracle for cut and paste answers. If the man page is accurate that should be good enough. On Jul 18, 2014 8:26 AM, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote: this is also another important point. If you go onto google and search on how to do

Re: /usr/home vs /home

On 22 November 2011 13:36, C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Thomas Mueller mueller6727@bellsouth.net wrote: But I don't see any advantage to putting /, /usr, and /var on separate partitions. Tom Regarding separate /usr and /var: the advantage is

Re: Strange ZFS filesystem corruption

On 6 October 2011 02:27, Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu wrote: On Oct 5, 2011, at 9:03 AM, krad wrote: Have you dont the simple thing and checked to see if you have any weird whitespace in the dir names. Try using bash tab completion for the dir name. Also drop all non bash completion

Re: Strange ZFS filesystem corruption

On 4 October 2011 17:09, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org wrote: 2011/10/3 Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu: I know ZFS does not have a fsck utility (because it doesn't need one:), but does anyone know of any way of fixing this corruption short of destroying the pool, creating a new one,

Re: Passive FTP

Those who still want active FTP (what on earth for?) I have encountered hosting companies in the past that only have inbound port 21 access for security reasons. I think this a bit odd but it is was it is. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote: Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org wrote: With the

Re: I am very confused and would appreciate some help on device renameing or on renumbering on current fstab.

On 4 May 2011 04:13, Jason Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net wrote: Edwin, /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 /dev/acd1 /cdrom1 cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 As a side note. These are also now useless can be sent to /dev/null

Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!

On 28 February 2011 08:47, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 04:03:01PM -0700, Shawn Webb wrote: I'm so excited for your work. Thanks so much for bringing zpool v28 to FreeBSD. Will v28 come to 8-stable? Yes, hopefully in 1-2 month(s). -- Pawel Jakub

Re: BSDInstall: merging to HEAD

On 14 January 2011 18:26, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote: As those of you who have been reading freebsd-sysinstall and freebsd-arch know, I have been working for a few weeks on a lightweight new installer named 'bsdinstall'. This is designed to replace sysinstall for the 9.0

Re: DHCP server in base

On 25 September 2010 21:10, Darren Pilgrim free...@bitfreak.org wrote: M. Warner Losh wrote: It would be very convenient to have this particular thing in the base, and we shouldn't be too dogmatic about never having any new 3rd party things in the base. Please no, don't add optional

Re: gptboot rewrite, bootonce, etc.

On 19 September 2010 18:10, Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote: Hi! On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 01:45:42 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: My company was in need for functionality similar to nextboot(8), but on boot loader level, so we can have two partitions we boot from where one is known to be

Re: gptboot rewrite, bootonce, etc.

On 20 September 2010 14:37, John Hay j...@meraka.org.za wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:59:20PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 20/09/2010 15:47 Pawel Jakub Dawidek said the following: No, it doesn't. ZFS works a bit differently. ZFS operate on pools, not really on partitions. One ZFS

Re: Dell Perc 5/i Performance issues

On 18 June 2010 10:08, oizs o...@freemail.hu wrote: I've seen people with the same configuration doing 160MB/s writes and 250MB/s+ reads with raid5 so I still think something isn't right. And using raid10 with 4 disks is a rather large waste of capacity. -zsozso On 2010.06.18. 1:55, Chuck

Re: newsyslog patch implementing file includes

On 22 April 2010 08:33, Alex Keda ad...@lissyara.su wrote: 22.04.2010 11:29, Gordon Tetlow ?: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Alex Keda ad...@lissyara.su mailto: ad...@lissyara.su wrote: It's need feature. I test patch - it work for me (CURRENT, amd64) Can I use some as:

Re: When will we can use ZFS v24?

On 7 April 2010 18:33, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote: In the last episode (Apr 07), krad said: On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy lhm...@gmail.com wrote: What's your mean?? See the archives for the freebsd

Re: When will we can use ZFS v24?

On 8 April 2010 17:47, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote: ZFS is still currently in heavy development so it might happen. Having siad that it looks like oracle have totally buggered it up for everyone with their retroactive licenses. I hope the CDL was tight enough that stuff wont

Re: When will we can use ZFS v24?

On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy lhm...@gmail.com wrote: What's your mean?? See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two separate groups working on getting ZFSv22 added to FreeBSD 9-CURRENT. And

Re: recovery from terminated make installworld?

On 18 March 2010 20:41, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Justin Hibbits jr...@alumni.cwru.edu wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: I was in the single user mode doing 'make installworld' when the