In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Pentchev writes:
: > I welcome the changes, but don't think the old version should be
: > removed: third party software uses it, and it would not serve any
: > purpose to break them.
:
: I'm definitely with Kris on this one; and I know of at least two other
:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:28:09PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed.
> >
> > The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a
> > single MAN variable. The o
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed.
>
> The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a
> single MAN variable. The old MAN[1-9] syntax is still
> supported, for backwards compatibility.
>
> Th
Hi!
The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed.
The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a
single MAN variable. The old MAN[1-9] syntax is still
supported, for backwards compatibility.
The plan is to MFC this feature after 4.3 release, and
start the deorbit sequence fo
