On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:00:15 +1030 (CST), Mark Newton
new...@atdot.dotat.org said:
If I split sigaction(), sigsuspend(), sigpending(), sigprocmask() and
sigaltstack() into front-end and back-end pieces a-la NetBSD so that
emulator-specific signal semantics can be imposed without totally
If I split sigaction(), sigsuspend(), sigpending(), sigprocmask() and
sigaltstack() into front-end and back-end pieces a-la NetBSD so that
emulator-specific signal semantics can be imposed without totally
duplicating those routines inside the emulator (like I did with
sendit() and recvit()
We currently have routines like fork1() and killpg1() in /sys/kern/*
to implement generic functionality for actions with more than one
front-end.
NetBSD has done something similar for signals, so that emulators
with non-BSD signal semantics can implement their way of doing things
as an
