Re: /usr/home vs /home

2011-11-24 Thread O. Hartmann
On 11/24/11 10:42, krad wrote: > On 22 November 2011 13:36, C. P. Ghost wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, <"Thomas Mueller >> wrote: >>> But I don't see any advantage to putting /, /usr, and /var on separate >> partitions. >>> >>> Tom >> >> Regarding separate /usr and /var: the adva

Re: /usr/home vs /home

2011-11-24 Thread krad
On 22 November 2011 13:36, C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, <"Thomas Mueller > wrote: > > But I don't see any advantage to putting /, /usr, and /var on separate > partitions. > > > > Tom > > Regarding separate /usr and /var: the advantage is that you can > keep /usr read-o

Re: /usr/home vs /home

2011-11-22 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, <"Thomas Mueller wrote: > But I don't see any advantage to putting /, /usr, and /var on separate > partitions. > > Tom Regarding separate /usr and /var: the advantage is that you can keep /usr read-only which is also important for security reasons since modifyi

Re: /usr/home vs /home

2011-11-22 Thread O. Hartmann
On 11/22/11 12:08, Hendrik Hasenbein wrote: > On 22.11.2011 11:30, "Thomas Mueller >> In the old days home was typically a separate partition that was >>> mounted on /home. If you didn't have a partition the installer >>> would create /usr/home and symlink /home to it. The root was also >>> typi

Re: /usr/home vs /home

2011-11-22 Thread Hendrik Hasenbein
On 22.11.2011 11:30, "Thomas Mueller > In the old days home was typically a separate partition that was >> mounted on /home. If you didn't have a partition the installer >> would create /usr/home and symlink /home to it. The root was also >> typically an independent partition, so it made sense n

Re: /usr/home vs /home

2011-11-22 Thread Thomas Mueller
> In the old days home was typically a separate partition that was > mounted on /home. If you didn't have a partition the installer would > create /usr/home and symlink /home to it. The root was also typically > an independent partition, so it made sense not to clutter it up with > home directori

Re: /usr/home vs /home

2011-11-21 Thread Martin Sugioarto
Am Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:15:36 -1000 schrieb David Cornejo : > I've always liked the more succinct /home and was wondering if there > is any reason why not to delete the symlink and move home to / to > mimic the old many partition style? Hi David, I like the idea of having /usr/home better, becaus

/usr/home vs /home

2011-11-21 Thread David Cornejo
Hi, In the old days home was typically a separate partition that was mounted on /home. If you didn't have a partition the installer would create /usr/home and symlink /home to it. The root was also typically an independent partition, so it made sense not to clutter it up with home directories.