On 27 Dec 2017, at 16:39, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On 16/12/17 2:39 am, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> Put the following into /etc/src.conf:
>
> This brings up two questions:
> when to use make.conf and when to use src.conf,
make.conf is for building everything, so ports,
On 16/12/17 2:39 am, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Put the following into /etc/src.conf:
This brings up two questions:
when to use make.conf and when to use src.conf,
and..
WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes
WITHOUT_DEBUG_FILES=yes
WITHOUT_TESTS=yes
which of the following is correct and why?
t; >>>
>>> >>> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
>>> >>> is now 11GB huge:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> FreeBSD 12-current
>>> >>> $ du -hs /usr/obj
>>&
rom 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
> > is now 11GB huge:
> >
> > FreeBSD 12-current
> > $ du -hs /usr/obj
> > 11G /usr/obj
> >
> > on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less the size:
> > $ du -hs /usr/obj
> >
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:12:09 +0100 "Wolfram Schneider" <wo...@freebsd.org> said
Hi,
I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
is now 11GB huge:
FreeBSD 12-current
$ du -hs /usr/obj
11G /usr/obj
on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less the size:
$ du -hs /u
>> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
>> is now 11GB huge:
>>
[snip]
>
> There was a change near the beginning of November; please see UPDATING
> entry 20171101 -- you probably have several no-longer-used
> subdirectories under /usr/obj/usr/src/.
>
> Once
On 12/15/17, 1:28 PM, "owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org"
<owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Wolfram Schneider writes:
> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
> is now 11GB huge:
>
> FreeBSD 12-
Wolfram Schneider writes:
> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
> is now 11GB huge:
>
> FreeBSD 12-current
> $ du -hs /usr/obj
> 11G /usr/obj
>
> on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less the size:
> $ du -hs /usr/obj
> 5.6G /u
olfskill <da...@catwhisker.org> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
>> &
+0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
> >>> is now 11GB huge:
> >>>
> >>> FreeBSD 12-current
> >>> $ du -hs /usr/obj
>
a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
>>> is now 11GB huge:
>>>
>>> FreeBSD 12-current
>>> $ du -hs /usr/obj
>>> 11G /usr/obj
>>>
>>> on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less the size:
>>> $ du -hs /usr/obj
>>
On 15 December 2017 at 13:02, David Wolfskill <da...@catwhisker.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
>> is now 11GB huge:
>>
>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
> is now 11GB huge:
>
> FreeBSD 12-current
> $ du -hs /usr/obj
> 11G /usr/obj
>
> on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less
Hi,
I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
is now 11GB huge:
FreeBSD 12-current
$ du -hs /usr/obj
11G /usr/obj
on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less the size:
$ du -hs /usr/obj
5.6G /usr/obj
this is a problem when you have a small VM with 20GB disk space or less
14 matches
Mail list logo