--- Mer 11/7/12, Dimitry Andric ha scritto:
...
>
> Does it catch any really interesting bound overruns?
>
Nah .. I arrived to the conclusion that it's not
really worth it :).
> If the number of false positives is very large, then it
> generally isn't
> worth the pain. Or the option should b
On 2012-07-11 05:41, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> I have a patch from OpenBSD that adds -Wbounded to gcc:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/patches/patch-gcc-bounded
>
> Unfortunately it breaks world, or at least binutils, at this time:
>
> _
> ...
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> pe
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:41:44PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> I have a patch from OpenBSD that adds -Wbounded to gcc:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/patches/patch-gcc-bounded
>
> Unfortunately it breaks world, or at least binutils, at this time:
>
> _
> ...
> cc1: warnings bein
Hello;
I have a patch from OpenBSD that adds -Wbounded to gcc:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/patches/patch-gcc-bounded
Unfortunately it breaks world, or at least binutils, at this time:
_
...
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
peigen.c: In function '_bfd_pei_swap_aux_in':
peigen.c:
