Re: [CURRENT] unbound: zonefiles?

2013-10-01 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Dimitry. You wrote 30 сентября 2013 г., 17:53:15: DA> Yes, and there is the rub for most 'SOHO' users, who do not win anything DA> by separating these roles. In such cases, setting up a separate IP DA> and/or port just to split up authoritative and recursive DNS is rather DA> inconvenient.

Re: [CURRENT] unbound: zonefiles?

2013-09-30 Thread O. Hartmann
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:28:36 -0500 Mark Felder wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013, at 4:26, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > I try my first steps with "unbound" on most recent current and > > snealing through the web I find interesting things and howto's. But > > I realise if I'd like to replace my office'

Re: [CURRENT] unbound: zonefiles?

2013-09-30 Thread Mark Felder
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 8:53, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Sep 30, 2013, at 14:28, Mark Felder wrote: > ... > > BIND functioned as both roles. The lack of separation is often why it is > > criticized. DJB made the separation of roles famous when he released > > DJBDNS which includes two daemons: dn

Re: [CURRENT] unbound: zonefiles?

2013-09-30 Thread Dimitry Andric
On Sep 30, 2013, at 14:28, Mark Felder wrote: ... > BIND functioned as both roles. The lack of separation is often why it is > criticized. DJB made the separation of roles famous when he released > DJBDNS which includes two daemons: dnscache and tinydns. > > The complementary daemon by the Unboun

Re: [CURRENT] unbound: zonefiles?

2013-09-30 Thread Mark Felder
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013, at 4:26, O. Hartmann wrote: > > I try my first steps with "unbound" on most recent current and snealing > through the web I find interesting things and howto's. But I realise if > I'd like to replace my office's DNS server (based on BIND as it was > part of the FreeBSD world)

Re: [CURRENT] unbound: zonefiles?

2013-09-30 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:26:48AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > I try my first steps with "unbound" on most recent current and snealing > through the web I find interesting things and howto's. But I realise if > I'd like to replace my office's DNS server (based on BIND as it was > part of the Fre

Re: [CURRENT] unbound: zonefiles?

2013-09-26 Thread O. Hartmann
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:06:47 +0800 Alastair Hogge wrote: > On 2013-09-26 Thu 11:26:48 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > I try my first steps with "unbound" on most recent current and > > snealing through the web I find interesting things and howto's. But > > I realise if I'd like to repla

Re: [CURRENT] unbound: zonefiles?

2013-09-26 Thread Alastair Hogge
On 2013-09-26 Thu 11:26:48 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: Hi, > I try my first steps with "unbound" on most recent current and snealing > through the web I find interesting things and howto's. But I realise if > I'd like to replace my office's DNS server (based on BIND as it was > part of the FreeBSD

[CURRENT] unbound: zonefiles?

2013-09-26 Thread O. Hartmann
I try my first steps with "unbound" on most recent current and snealing through the web I find interesting things and howto's. But I realise if I'd like to replace my office's DNS server (based on BIND as it was part of the FreeBSD world) I run into a serious problem regarding the zone- and author