On (2002/06/30 11:15), Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> Grrr, hit me baby one more time.
>
> One of the diffs included a completely gratuitous one-line change which
> I made yesterday night while I was tired and neglected to correct today.
>
> So, the patchset again. (Take three!)
I've tested your pa
Grrr, hit me baby one more time.
One of the diffs included a completely gratuitous one-line change which
I made yesterday night while I was tired and neglected to correct today.
So, the patchset again. (Take three!)
--
Regards:
Szilveszter ADAM
Szombathely Hungary
Index: Makefile
==
Hello everybody,
Sorry for taking a tad long with this, here is the second patch set for
the GDB info files.
I implemented both of David's suggestions, so the third patch is no
longer needed and GDBvn.texi can be safely cvs rm-d now, it is generated
dynamically at build time.
If you want to go
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 03:29:20PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> 1) The GNU folks have a way of generating GDBvn.texi from version.in, so
> that it has the same version information than the source code. We use
> the GDBvn.texi file supplied with the distribution. (which was not
> updated BTW, s
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 05:49:33PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> Hello Sheldon,
>
> As far as I know, so far only the ones for GDB (and that only under
> -CURRENT). If you get there first, go for it, but if not, I will also
> look at the issue during the weekend.
To follow up on this: I have
