On 6/6/2003 9:29 PM, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:17:43PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I already wondered how you could route interrupts without ACPI until I
: booted my printserver with a
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jens Rehsack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On 6/6/2003 9:29 PM, Bernd Walter wrote:
: On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:17:43PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : I already
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:08:12PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
dmesg of machine which now runs with the fix:
npx0: math processor on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
pcibios: BIOS version 2.10
pcib0: Host to PCI bridge at pcibus 0 on motherboard
Same situtation with my Board - no $PIR
I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts.
Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific
and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then
we don't change the intline. In other words, if we can't route the
interrupt, we just
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:13:31PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts.
Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific
and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then
we don't change the
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts.
: Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific
: and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then
:
On 06-Jun-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts.
: Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific
: and 2) if the interrupt route
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:13:31PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts.
Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific
and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then
we don't change the
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:36:54PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts.
: Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific
: and
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:04:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On 06-Jun-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, we haven't
recorded our info in the underlying pci register. Don't know if that
will matter for
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:36:54PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I already wondered how you could route interrupts without ACPI until I
: booted my printserver with a recent kernel.
PCIBIOS!
Warner
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:17:43PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I already wondered how you could route interrupts without ACPI until I
: booted my printserver with a recent kernel.
PCIBIOS!
Well - I'm not
13 matches
Mail list logo
