On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:21:11PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, May 27, 2016 09:17:01 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> > quite some time ago I posted a trivial patch to locking primitives. What
> > they do is the inline part tries an atomic op and if that fails the
> > act
On Friday, May 27, 2016 09:17:01 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> quite some time ago I posted a trivial patch to locking primitives. What
> they do is the inline part tries an atomic op and if that fails the
> actual function is called, which immediately tries the same op.
>
> The obvi
On 05/27/16 02:17 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> quite some time ago I posted a trivial patch to locking primitives. What
> they do is the inline part tries an atomic op and if that fails the
> actual function is called, which immediately tries the same op.
>
> The obvious optimisation
Hello there,
quite some time ago I posted a trivial patch to locking primitives. What
they do is the inline part tries an atomic op and if that fails the
actual function is called, which immediately tries the same op.
The obvious optimisation checks for the availability of the lock first.
There
