On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi,
ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision r108243 which we plan to
merge into HEAD. We would like that revision to be tested as much as possible
and therefore we ask you to test ClangBSD to assure that the
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Marcelo/Porks marceloro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi,
ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision r108243 which we plan to
merge into HEAD. We would like that revision to be tested as much as
On 15-07-2010 19:42, Roman Divacky wrote:
I updated clang/LLVM in clangbsd to a newer version which I believe
will fix thas. can you rene (and everyone else) please retest with
updated ClangBSD and report back?
The updated version builds and installs fine, I'm now running the
clangbsd kernel.
2010/7/14 Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org:
hi,
ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision r108243 which we plan to
merge into HEAD. We would like that revision to be tested as much as possible
and therefore we ask you to test ClangBSD to assure that the revision
we are updating to does
I updated clang/LLVM in clangbsd to a newer version which I believe
will fix thas. can you rene (and everyone else) please retest with
updated ClangBSD and report back?
thank you!
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:33:04PM +0200, Ren? Ladan wrote:
2010/7/14 Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org:
hi,
hi,
ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision r108243 which we plan to
merge into HEAD. We would like that revision to be tested as much as possible
and therefore we ask you to test ClangBSD to assure that the revision
we are updating to does not have some really embarassing bugs.
How to do it
