I would think we need to at least patch current for this case. Enclosed
is a possible implementation. Comments?
- JimP
On Friday 11 October 2002 07:53 am, Tim Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:07:36AM -0700, Jim Pirzyk wrote:
Does anyone have experience running a recient -CURRENT
Jim Pirzyk wrote:
I would think we need to at least patch current for this case. Enclosed
is a possible implementation. Comments?
This:
+optionsVMWARE
Should be this:
+optionsCPU_DISABLE_CMPXFHG
...otherwise, it looks fine.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Pirzyk writes:
I would think we need to at least patch current for this case. Enclosed
is a possible implementation. Comments?
I think I tried this before, and puting the option in opt_cpu.h
does not work, because not all files that include atomic.h will
define the 386' cpu type.
it will make it not use some instructins that are not in the original
386.
these instructions are also emulated VERY SLOWLY by vmware
so not using them speeds up things..
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Jim Pirzyk wrote:
Does anyone have experience running a recient -CURRENT as
