Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com writes:
Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
ports that assume a standard utmp/utmp.x to break for example
x11-toolkits/vte produces:
I guess it's a user error, utmpx.h and utmp.h shouldn't both be present.
See similar
Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
ports that assume a standard utmp/utmp.x to break for example
x11-toolkits/vte produces:
gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of 'pty_add'
discards qualifiers from pointer target type
mv -f
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
ports that assume a standard utmp/utmp.x to break for example
x11-toolkits/vte produces:
gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of
No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of
ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution
vs. fixing base)
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:16:58PM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of
ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution
vs. fixing base)
I don't see any related commits to 8-STABLE, which commit are you
reffering
