On Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 12:25:33PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
[snipped some part]
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET),
Thomas Schuerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
--- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999
+++ sbc.c Tue Dec 7 22:15:25 1999
@@ -110,7 +110,7
So then what is -1 and why does it work when -100 doesn't? (I tried it)
-Charlie
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 09:13:41PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere?
It's not, yet. We should move to using some defines for this.
A while back I
[snipped some part]
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET),
Thomas Schuerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
--- sbc.c.origMon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999
+++ sbc.c Tue Dec 7 22:15:25 1999
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
if (error)
return error;
else
-
Hi!
I am still having problems getting my AWE64 soundcard to
work with the newpcm driver (the "old" pcm driver worked
fine). I have updated the world last week and am using
the kernel as of today. I'm using the "pcm0" and "sbc0"
devices in my kernel options. My card is recognized
correctly, but
I hate me too messages, but I'm having problems too. Exact same symptoms.
I looked at sbc.c and it has the correct logical id, I spent some time
looking at this last night, but was stymied by my lack of understanding
of how the pnp system works. I even tried it with PNPBIOS defined, but
that
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 06:43:55PM +0100, Thomas Schuerger wrote:
Hi!
I am still having problems getting my AWE64 soundcard to
work with the newpcm driver (the "old" pcm driver worked
fine).
Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Are there more people
having problems with their AWE64?
Any
I am still having problems getting my AWE64 soundcard to
work with the newpcm driver (the "old" pcm driver worked
fine).
Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Are there more people
having problems with their AWE64?
I had the same problem with my AWE64. An older kernel
@(#)FreeBSD
I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere?
Who calls it?
-Charlie
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:30:46AM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET),
Thomas Schuerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
--- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999
I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere?
It's not, yet. We should move to using some defines for this.
A while back I proposed something like:
#define DEVICE_MATCH_EXACT -100
#define DEVICE_MATCH_CLASS -200
#define DEVICE_MATCH_GENERIC-300
The
