On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 03:46:42AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
FWIW: If FreeBSD wanted to use this approach, the safest way to do
it would b to split the user and kernel address space mappings; in
general, this will only mean modifying uiomove/copy{in|out}[str],
and dealing with the address
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:24:23AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
[Darwin pre-binding]
presumably applies to other processor architectures. The one thing that
turns me off to this scheme is that I'd like it if we could find a way to
represent this using solely existing BSD/UNIX kernel primitives
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 07:59, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:24:23AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
[Darwin pre-binding]
presumably applies to other processor architectures. The one thing that
turns me off to this scheme is that I'd like it if we could find a way to
represent
David Rhodus wrote:
Terry Lambert wrote:
FWIW, even though I support the idea of dynamically linking
everything, the flipping of the switch there followed this
same pattern.
First, a disclaimer: this is me speaking for me; I do not speak
for Apple.
Terry, what are some of the changes that
Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, David Rhodus wrote:
what are some of the changes that Apple made to have everything
dynamically linked in darwin ? Has anyone done timed runs lately on
dynamically vers. static linking on darwin ? Or did they find just
cleaning up the dlopen code
Terry Lambert wrote:
FWIW, even though I support the idea of dynamically linking
everything, the flipping of the switch there followed this
same pattern.
-- Terry
Terry, what are some of the changes that Apple made to have everything
dynamically
linked in darwin ? Has anyone done timed runs
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, David Rhodus wrote:
FWIW, even though I support the idea of dynamically linking
everything, the flipping of the switch there followed this
same pattern.
Terry, what are some of the changes that Apple made to have everything
dynamically linked in darwin ? Has anyone
RW Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:24:23 -0500 (EST)
RW From: Robert Watson
[ CC list trimmed ]
RW The one thing that turns me off to this scheme is that I'd
RW like it if we could find a way to represent this using solely
RW existing BSD/UNIX kernel primitives (mmap, et al) and
RW userspace, rather
