On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:58:47PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
Did you see this log?
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 02:53:11 -0700 (PDT),
"David E. O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'll take a look at this on Monday. Thanks! for the bug reports -- just
what I wanted to hear before I thought about a
Reversing that patch fixes it. Since the source for this is in contrib,
I presume we
need to send this back to ISC rather than patch it in our tree?
Tatsumi Hosokawa wrote:
At Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:22:15 -0700 (PDT),
Nick Sayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something changed very recently in
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 13:26:02 -0700,
Nick Sayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Nick Reversing that patch fixes it. Since the source for this is in contrib,
Nick I presume we
Nick need to send this back to ISC rather than patch it in our tree?
Nick Tatsumi Hosokawa wrote:
(snip)
- if [
At Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:22:15 -0700 (PDT),
Nick Sayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something changed very recently in the dhcp client stuff that seems
to have broke my -current machine's ability to be a dhcp client.
The symptom is that I see
ifconfig: netmask 255.255.255.224: bad value
Something changed very recently in the dhcp client stuff that seems
to have broke my -current machine's ability to be a dhcp client.
The symptom is that I see
ifconfig: netmask 255.255.255.224: bad value
come out of the script invocation, and the ip address does not get
set.
If I echo out the
