There's a new tool that can be used to find spelling mistakes in code:
codespell
from http://www.politreco.com has already been used to find mistakes in both
Linux and LLVM. I ran it on sys/ and it found lots of potential typos - the
full diff (which I know does contain some incorrect changes)
On Tue, 19.04.2011 at 12:15:00 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
There's a new tool that can be used to find spelling mistakes in code:
codespell
from http://www.politreco.com has already been used to find mistakes in both
Linux and LLVM. I ran it on sys/ and it found lots of potential typos - the
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:15:00PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
There's a new tool that can be used to find spelling mistakes in code:
codespell
from http://www.politreco.com has already been used to find mistakes in both
Linux and LLVM. I ran it on sys/ and it found lots of potential typos -
On 19.04.2011 13:15, Bruce Cran wrote:
There's a new tool that can be used to find spelling mistakes in code: codespell
from http://www.politreco.com has already been used to find mistakes in both
Linux and LLVM. I ran it on sys/ and it found lots of potential typos - the
full diff (which I know
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 13:15:00 Bruce Cran wrote:
There's a new tool that can be used to find spelling mistakes in code:
codespell from http://www.politreco.com has already been used to find
mistakes in both Linux and LLVM. I ran it on sys/ and it found lots of
potential typos - the full
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 02:22:10PM +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Tue, 19.04.2011 at 12:15:00 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
There's a new tool that can be used to find spelling mistakes in code:
codespell
from http://www.politreco.com has already been used to find mistakes in both
Linux and
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 08:17:37PM -0400, J. Hellenthal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 02:22:10PM +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Tue, 19.04.2011 at 12:15:00 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
There's a new tool that can be used to find spelling mistakes in code:
codespell
from
